1982
DOI: 10.1104/pp.70.6.1710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ploidy Effects in Isogenic Populations of Alfalfa

Abstract: Photosynthetically-active protoplasts isolated from isogenic sets of diploid-tetraploid and tetraplold-octoplold alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaves were used to investigate the consequences of polyploidization on several aspects related to photosynthesis at the cellular level. Protoplasts from the tetraploid population contained twice the amount of DNA, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase), chlorophyll (Chi), and chloroplasts per cell compared to protoplasts from the diploid population. Although p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyploid individuals may not always be superior to diploid ones: in some cases polyploid plants have slower growth rates (Ranney 2006) which could be attributed to difficulties in the cell cycle and slow cell division (Comai 2005), causing lower cell numbers and smaller organs. For example, it was reported that the overall chlorophyll content in polyploid plants is higher than diploid ones with lower chromosome numbers (Molin et al 1982;Warner et al 1987;Mathura et al 2006), while total chlorophyll content of tetraploid sugar beet genotypes ("AD 440" and "CBM 315") in our study were found to be lower than that of diploid ones ("Agnessa" and "Felicita").…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Polyploid individuals may not always be superior to diploid ones: in some cases polyploid plants have slower growth rates (Ranney 2006) which could be attributed to difficulties in the cell cycle and slow cell division (Comai 2005), causing lower cell numbers and smaller organs. For example, it was reported that the overall chlorophyll content in polyploid plants is higher than diploid ones with lower chromosome numbers (Molin et al 1982;Warner et al 1987;Mathura et al 2006), while total chlorophyll content of tetraploid sugar beet genotypes ("AD 440" and "CBM 315") in our study were found to be lower than that of diploid ones ("Agnessa" and "Felicita").…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The number of photosynthetic cells per unit leaf area decreases with increasing ploidy level (Warner and Edwards 1989). Although chloroplasts (Beck, Dunlop et al 2003;) and chlorophyll content (Molin et al 1982) are higher in polyploid genotypes, increased chlorophyll content with increasing ploidy level is not always apparent. For instance, chlorophyll content remained constant in different ploidy levels of Atriplex confertifolia (Warner and Edwards 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies involving a wide range of polyploid species, including auto-and allopolyploids in both C3 and C4 species, have shown that polyploids often have larger mesophyll cells with more chloroplasts, higher chlorophyll and rubisco contents and greater photosynthetic capacities per cell than their diploid counterparts (for example, Dunstone and Evans, 1974;Molin et al, 1982;citations in Warner and Edwards, 1993;Coate et al, 2012). At the whole-leaf level, the effects of polyploidy are highly variable and not all polyploids examined exhibit greater photosynthetic capacities per unit leaf area (for example, Coate et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was used by many authors (Possingham and Smith, 1972;Boffey et al, 1979;Lamppa et al, 1980;Molin et al, 1982;Tymms et al, 1983;Sung and Chen, 1989;Pyke and Leech, 1991;Yamasaki et al, 1996;Marrison et al, 1999;Ivanova and P'yankov, 2002;Meyer et al, 2006;Stettler et al, 2009). This estimation is unbiased since counting is done in the whole cell, provided the chloroplasts in the specimen are not overlapping and the cells used for chloroplast counting are selected in an unbiased way.…”
Section: Number Of Mesophyll Cells and Chloroplastsmentioning
confidence: 99%