Despite a climate of authoritarianism and heavy censorship of independent media and political opposition in post-Soviet Kazakhstan, Kazakh aitys akhyndar (improvisational poets) have emerged as a voice of sociopolitical critique. In excerpts analyzed here, poets speaking as and for the xalykh (Kazakh people) berated contemporary Kazakhstani leaders as greedy, impotent, and russified. This article examines how poets' successful critique was made possible and protected by the conflictive and collaborative nature of poets' dialogues, by the legitimacy of aitys as "authentic Kazakh culture" as a result of folklorization processes, and by the collusion of the tradition's sponsors, members of the country's political elite. (Kazakh aitys, poetic dialogism, accountability in performance, post-Soviet nationalisms, cultural sponsorship, folklorization, Central Asian media, post-Soviet political critique).j ola_1051 101..115
Poetry and CriticismK azakh aitys, improvisational poetry, is one of the many oral and musical traditions linking Turkey across the Eurasian steppe to Mongolia and China. Literally meaning "shared talk," aitys refers both to a genre and to a competitive performance in which at least two characters or personae pit their words and wits toward victory, leaving their opponent trumped, sometimes literally speechless, without words. A victory is also marked by the use of solu suzder (beautiful words) and adaly suzder (ancestors' words), words and phrases that demonstrate knowledge of previous cultural texts, that employ metaphor, and that characterize a situation precisely, to great effect. Aitys is always performed in front of an audience, and by tradition it is audience approval that ultimately decides the winner. Aitys is always a dialogue (Zharmukhamedoly 2001:26). One poet may voice both personae, but it is much more typical for two poets to engage in a verbal duel (as defined by Pagliai, this issue).This article explores how, due to (1) processes of folklorization, (2) elite sponsorship, and (3) the conflictive and dialogic nature of the poetry itself, aitys has become a vehicle of sociopolitical critique in Kazakhstan. For the last 20-odd years, a national network of culture producers, including formerly high-ranking members of the socialist intelligentsia and communist party elite, 1 as well as members of the current president's inner circle, has established a regular series of performances across the country (and in the Kazakh diaspora of neighboring countries) which attract audiences of hundreds and which are typically televised on a national station. 2 Unlike regular holiday performances at the regional level, funded by monies channeled from the state government as they were during the Soviet period, the new national network has relied primarily on independent sponsors for its livelihood. In an otherwise authoritarian environment of repression and censorship, poets have