Pointing at 3D targets in a stereo head-tracked virtual environment

Teather, Robert J.; Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang

doi:10.1109/3dui.2011.5759222

Cited by 109 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, it has been show that such tactile (or pen-based) interaction suffers from the parallax between the two images that are shown for both of the eyes [13,14,24,82,83]. In addition, touch-through [19,78,81] and invisible wall problems make such an interaction setup problematic. Only in situations when the element to be accessed by the surfacebased input is at a close distance to input screen do users perceive their input to directly control the manipulated elements [83].…”

Section: D Stereoscopic Viewing Of 3d Data Visualizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive Exploration of Three-Dimensional Scientific Visualizations on Large Display Surfaces

Isenberg

2016

Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

6 . The text of this author version is virtually identical to the published one, albeit uses better typography and more hyperlinks (e. g., from the figures to online videos of the described interaction technique(s)). Notice also that many of the images contained in the publisher's online version are of lower quality than those contained in this author-prepared version.Abstract The chapter surveys the different approaches investigated to interact with scientific visualizations on large surfaces such as tables and walls. The chapter particularly does not focus on VR-based interaction or tangible input but on those interaction techniques where the input is provided on the surface itself or where it is focused on the surface. In particular, tactile interaction techniques are covered and the challenges of gestural input as well as of combining touch input with stereoscopic rendering are discussed. Where possible, connections to collaborative interaction scenarios are pointed out, even though most publications to date focus on single-user interaction.

show abstract

Section: D Stereoscopic Viewing Of 3d Data Visualizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive Exploration of Three-Dimensional Scientific Visualizations on Large Display Surfaces

Isenberg

2016

Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the monoscopic case the mapping between an on-surface touch point and the intended object point in the virtual scene is straightforward, but with stereoscopic projection this mapping introduces problems [48]. To enable direct 3D "touch" selection of stereoscopically displayed objects in space, 3D tracking technologies can capture a user's hand or finger motions in front of the display surface.…”

Section: Touch Screen Interaction and S3dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen Interaction

Colley

Häkkilä

Schöning

et al. 2015

Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The penetration of stereoscopic 3D (S3D) output devices is becoming widespread. S3D screens range in size from large cinema screens, to tabletop displays, TVs in living rooms, and even mobile devices are nowadays equipped with autostereoscopic 3D screens. As a consequence, the requirement for interacting with 3D content is also increasing, with "touch" being one of the dominant input methods. However, the design requirements and best practices for interaction with S3D touch screen user interfaces are only now evolving. To understand the challenges and limitations S3D technology brings to interaction design, and in particular the additional demands they place on the users of such interfaces, we present our research that considers stereoscopic touch screens of different sizes in static and mobile usage contexts. We report on perceptual, cognitive and behavioral aspects revealed by user studies and present interaction design requirements based on the findings.

show abstract

“…Recent studies of Teather et al [12,13] deal with pointing task evaluation in a 3D environment based on the ISO standard. In the first study [12], targets are spheres disposed on a 2D circle on a vertical plane.…”

Section: Mtmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the first study [12], targets are spheres disposed on a 2D circle on a vertical plane. In the second study, the representation used is a 3D scene [13] in which targets are circles placed on cylinders. In both cases, due to the perspective rendering mode, targets representation appears on a plane, either horizontal or vertical: selecting a target thus results of the combination of a 2D pointing on the plane with the use of a ray-casting technique to reach the appropriate depth.…”

Section: Mtmentioning

confidence: 99%