2013
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2012.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poisson Coordinates

Abstract: Goodearl and Launois have shown in [GL11] that for a log-canonical Poisson bracket on affine space there is no rational change of coordinates for which the Poisson bracket is constant. Our main result is a proof of a conjecture of Michael Shapiro which states that if affine space is given a log-canonical Poisson bracket, then there does not exist any rational change of coordinates for which the Poisson bracket is linear. Hence, log-canonical coordinates can be thought of as the simplest possible algebraic coor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are positive inside the kernel of star‐shaped polygons, satisfy the Lagrange property, and are smooth everywhere in the plane, except at the vertices of the polygon, where they are only C 0 continuous. Other closed‐form GBC that are well‐defined for concave polygons are metric [MLD05; SM06], moving least squares [MS10], Poisson [LH13], cubic mean value [LJH13], and Gordon–Wixom [GW74; Bel06]. There even exists a whole family of coordinates that are well‐defined for degenerate polygons [YS19], but all these constructions can be negative inside the domain.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are positive inside the kernel of star‐shaped polygons, satisfy the Lagrange property, and are smooth everywhere in the plane, except at the vertices of the polygon, where they are only C 0 continuous. Other closed‐form GBC that are well‐defined for concave polygons are metric [MLD05; SM06], moving least squares [MS10], Poisson [LH13], cubic mean value [LJH13], and Gordon–Wixom [GW74; Bel06]. There even exists a whole family of coordinates that are well‐defined for degenerate polygons [YS19], but all these constructions can be negative inside the domain.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This family also includes mean value coordinates [Flo03, HF06], which come with the advantage of being well‐defined for non‐convex polygons and polyhedra, too [FKR05, JSW05]. Whole families of barycentric coordinates for non‐convex polygons and polyhedra were constructed by [BLTD16] and [YS19], but just like metric [MLD05], Poisson [LH13], and Gordon–Wixom coordinates [Bel06], they may take on negative values at certain v ∈ Ω. Some constructions guarantee the non‐negativity of the coordinates, but at the price of not depending smoothly on either v ∈ Ω [LKCOL07,MLS11] or the vertices v i [APH17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we compare the approximation qualities (precision/convergence) of these partition-of-unity, generalized barycentric finite elements, through several numerical experiments, and using various barycentric coordinates. These are Wachspress coordinates [47], mean value coordinates (MVCs) [20], natural neighbor coordinates (also called as Sibson’s coordinates) [40], and Poisson coordinates [26]. Two greedy algorithms to generate Voronoi meshes for adaptive functional/scattered data approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%