2005
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-05-07998-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poisson geometry of differential invariants of curves in some nonsemisimple homogeneous spaces

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we describe a family of compatible Poisson structures defined on the space of coframes (or differential invariants) of curves in flat homogeneous spaces of the form M ∼ = (G R n )/G where G ⊂ GL(n, R) is semisimple. This includes Euclidean, affine, special affine, Lorentz, and symplectic geometries. We also give conditions on geometric evolutions of curves in the manifold M so that the induced evolution on their differential invariants is Hamiltonian with respect to our main Hamiltonian… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the calculations that follow are, in that sense, formal. This situation was discussed in [Marí 2006].…”
Section: Geometric Realizations Of Hamiltonian Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the calculations that follow are, in that sense, formal. This situation was discussed in [Marí 2006].…”
Section: Geometric Realizations Of Hamiltonian Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following theorem was proved in [Marí 2006] and describes the most general form of invariant evolutions in terms of left moving frames.…”
Section: Geometric Realizations Of Hamiltonian Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the continuous case, the existence of a Poisson structure on the moduli space of curves is guaranteed not only for the case of j1j-graded Lie algebras but also for general homogeneous manifolds of the form G=H with G semisimple [Marí Beffa 2010] and for semidirect products [Marí Beffa 2006]. It is well possible that the same is true for the discrete counterpart, but the discrete case is more difficult to study.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, u n−1 ) is defined by the curvatures k =m = u + u xx ,Q = | u| 2 + | u x | 2 . Then the flow (38) is intrinsic and the curvature vectorm fulf ills the equation (37).…”
Section: Curve F Lows On S N (1) and Multi-component Modif Ied Ch Equmentioning
confidence: 99%