Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious

Quinn, Philip L.

doi:10.2307/3130495

Cited by 22 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On this indelibility, see representatively Campos (1994), Macdonald (2010), Gregory (2006), Roberts (2004), Hjarvard (2011), Engelhardt (2011, Kuru (2007), Hurd (2004) and Quinn (1995). 15.…”

Section: Culture and Religion 163mentioning

confidence: 96%

In the letter of mere reason: Rethinking the universal secular intellectual with Immanuel Kant, Jacques Derrida and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

Soni

2013

Culture and Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Culture and Religion 163mentioning

confidence: 96%

In the letter of mere reason: Rethinking the universal secular intellectual with Immanuel Kant, Jacques Derrida and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

Soni

2013

Culture and Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…El desacuerdo sobre cuál es la mejor justificación, en el primer caso, o sobre cuál de las políticas suficientemente justas ejemplifica la justicia perfecta, en el segundo caso, persistirá. Sostener que la razón pública es completa (i.e., que los materiales que contiene -(A2), (A3) y (A4), en nuestra terminología-son suficientes para determinar en todos los casos qué política pública está justificada -Quinn 1995, Reidy 2000, Greenawalt 1988, Gaus 1996, Schwartzmann 2004, Williams 2000 no implica comprometerse con la eliminación del desacuerdo. Por el contrario, el punto central es saber cuándo nuestras leyes y medidas públicas están justificadas inclusive frente al desacuerdo persistente que pueden mostrar algunos de los ciudadanos razonables sobre lo que la justicia perfecta requiere.…”

Section: Hacia Un Nuevo Modelo De Razón Públicaunclassified

El triple estándar de la razón pública

Vaca

Mayans

2014

CRHF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Varios autores afines al proyecto del liberalismo político han propuesto diferentes modelos de razón pública para enfrentar la situación de desacuerdo moral permanente en las sociedades liberales. En este trabajo presentamos un modelo que defiende dos argumentos. Primero, argumentamos a favor de una interpretación deflacionista de las razones que son aceptables para los ciudadanos razonables. Segundo, introducimos una nueva terminología que distingue entre lo que llamamos razones dependientes, accesibles y aceptables. Sostenemos que sólo las segundas y las terceras son medios adecuados de discusión dentro de la razón pública, y las terceras son un estándar correcto de justificación de política pública.

show abstract

“…Despite Rawls's support for the inclusive view, some religious critics felt that the view was not inclusive enough. Philip Quinn (1997, 152) focuses on cases in which public reason fails to provide uniquely reasonable answers to troubling questions. Rawls's ideal then asks us to try for a balance of values that we think other citizens will see as reasonable, or at least not unreasonable (Rawls 1996, 253) 9 .…”

Section: The Duty Of Civilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rawls's Political Liberalism. A Reassessment

Nussbaum¹

2011

Ratio Juris

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since Rawls's Political Liberalism is by now the subject of a wide and deep philosophical literature, much of it excellent in quality, it would be foolhardy to attempt to say something about each of the major issues of the work, or to sort through debates that can easily be located elsewhere. I have therefore decided to focus on a small number of issues where there is at least some chance that a fresh approach may yield some new understanding of the text: Rawls's distinction between "reasonable" and "unreasonable" comprehensive doctrines; the psychological underpinnings of political liberalism; and the possibility that political liberalism might be extended beyond the small group of modern Western societies that Rawls's historical remarks suggest as its primary focus. I also include a discussion of the much-debated issue of civility and public reason, which could hardly be avoided given its prominence in the book's reception. This paper should therefore be read not as a comprehensive account of the work but as one person's attempt to grapple, very incompletely and imperfectly, with a book that is as great as any philosophy has seen on this topic of great human urgency.

show abstract

Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious

Cited by 22 publications

References 0 publications

In the letter of mere reason: Rethinking the universal secular intellectual with Immanuel Kant, Jacques Derrida and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

In the letter of mere reason: Rethinking the universal secular intellectual with Immanuel Kant, Jacques Derrida and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

El triple estándar de la razón pública

Rawls's Political Liberalism. A Reassessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About