Political Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between Politik Aliran and 'Philippinisation'

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. i.e. some of the biggest political parties still have a mass base and are embedded in specific milieus. But politik aliran has lost a lot of its significance and re-emerged in a quite different form after the fall of Suharto in 1998. Starting with this observation, it is argued that parties are still socially rooted, so a modified aliran approach still has its analytical value. Terms of use: Documents inHowever, one can also witness a weakening of aliran (dealiranisasi) and a concomitant 'Philippinisation', which is indicated by the rise of presidential or presidentialised parties, growing intra-party authoritarianism, the prevalence of 'money politics', the lack of meaningful political platforms, weak loyalties towards parties, cartels with shifting coalitions and the upsurge of new local elites.

Does Vote Buying Affect Voting Behaviour? Chasing Winning Margins and the Prisoner’s Dilemma

“…Utilising from a large dataset of voters' surveys in 73 out of 77 electoral districts across Indonesia, I find that the use of mass media in supporting individual campaigns was apparent, but the scale was much less than many observers have expected (i.e. Ufen, 2006), as I will demonstrate in the following pages.…”

Sentimen Politik-Agama Dan Dinamika Keamanan Nasional Di Indonesia Pasca 2014

“…Dalam konfigurasi partai politik, meskipun di tingkat elite mereka terdorong untuk bertindak pragmatis, tetapi di kesempatan lain partai-partai seringkali memanfaatkan isuisu dan identitas agama untuk menarik simpati. Partai-partai Islam akan terus berupaya untuk menyimbolkan diri, walau tidak membatasi diri, sebagai representasi kalangan santri dan orientasi kebijakan yang pro terhadap syariat atau pro mendudukkan Islam dalam politik (Pepinsky, Liddle, & Mujani, 2012 (Ufen, 2006). Pada era reformasi, Megawati Sukarnoputeri mendirikan PDI Perjuangan (PDIP) yang menolak tunduk kepada Suharto.…”

The Moslem as Minority Community in Democracy Process (An Analysis of the Regional Election Dynamics in Toraja Regions)

“…In the context of the party system, one of the most fundamental policies by Suharto was the political party fusion in 1973. Through this policy, Suharto made restricted opportunity for political parties exist thru classify them in only two political parties and one faction to participate in elections (Ufen 2006). It was only the United Development Party (PPP), Indonesian Democratic Party (PDI), and the Functional Group (Golkar).…”