2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0022278x05001436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics, donors and the ineffectiveness of anti-corruption institutions in Uganda

Abstract: Elite corruption in Uganda constitutes an essential means of consolidating the present government in power. Political leaders have therefore shown little commitment to act to curb practices that could affect their political support. Instead, anti-corruption institutions have been influenced and controlled whenever they threatened to expose the corrupt ways of Uganda's state elites. Donors have also for many years been reluctant to use their substantial economic assistance to press the government to confront wr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…228 This is evident from donors' acceptance of elections that fall short of minimal standards (see Brown and Obi this collection 229 ), their clear preference for economic growth and political stability in the context of such 'donor darlings' as Museveni's Uganda (see Keating 230 this collection) 231 and Kagame's Rwanda (see Beswick 232 this collection), 233 and their marked reluctance to 'use their substantial economic assistance to press the government to confront wrongdoing by state elites', as in Uganda for instance. 234 Secondly, economic and political conditionality has limited the scope for policy debate 235 and thus political party differentiation. It has also rendered 'democratic' governments more accountable to the donor community than to local electorates 236 or to parliaments, with the experience of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) being 'one in which MPs have been expected to rubber-stamp documents written according to a standard template, despite the cosy discourse of African ownership'.…”
Section: Donors and The Ambiguities Of 'Democracy Promotion'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…228 This is evident from donors' acceptance of elections that fall short of minimal standards (see Brown and Obi this collection 229 ), their clear preference for economic growth and political stability in the context of such 'donor darlings' as Museveni's Uganda (see Keating 230 this collection) 231 and Kagame's Rwanda (see Beswick 232 this collection), 233 and their marked reluctance to 'use their substantial economic assistance to press the government to confront wrongdoing by state elites', as in Uganda for instance. 234 Secondly, economic and political conditionality has limited the scope for policy debate 235 and thus political party differentiation. It has also rendered 'democratic' governments more accountable to the donor community than to local electorates 236 or to parliaments, with the experience of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) being 'one in which MPs have been expected to rubber-stamp documents written according to a standard template, despite the cosy discourse of African ownership'.…”
Section: Donors and The Ambiguities Of 'Democracy Promotion'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perverse effects can also occur at the macro level, if political trends are misunderstood. Large amounts of aid -and in particular aid provided through modalities preferable from a harmonisation and alignment perspective, such as general budget support -have been disbursed to some incumbent regimes even as their commitment to development was visibly waning (Tangri and Mwenda, 2006). One conclusion drawn by many from the problems associated with a technocratic approach is that donors ought to become more explicitly political in their work.…”
Section: The Role Aims and Shortcomings Of External Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGG does possess prosecutorial powers but has been politically constrained Elite Corruption and Politics in Uganda 187 in exercising them. What appears evident is that the political executive has shown a clear interest in weakening and undermining those anti-corruption mechanisms that have sought to hold state leaders accountable for their misdeeds (Tangri & Mwenda, 2006). President Museveni continues to re-affirm his government's commitment to rid the country of corruption.…”
Section: Elite Corruption and Anti-corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%