2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism analysis of trans-1,4-polyisoprene during melt-recrystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the crystallized i PB inhibited the crystallization of TPI. The melting temperature regions at 44°C to 52°C represent the Tm of α form and β form crystal of TPI phase, 47 and melting temperature regions at 117°C represent the melting peak of i PB Form II 48 . T m of i PB phase in the as‐obtained alloys is higher than that of pure i PB, which means the perfection of crystallinity of i PB phase in alloys is higher than pure i PB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the crystallized i PB inhibited the crystallization of TPI. The melting temperature regions at 44°C to 52°C represent the Tm of α form and β form crystal of TPI phase, 47 and melting temperature regions at 117°C represent the melting peak of i PB Form II 48 . T m of i PB phase in the as‐obtained alloys is higher than that of pure i PB, which means the perfection of crystallinity of i PB phase in alloys is higher than pure i PB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Notably, the diffraction peak at 22.7° displayed a low intensity while the diffraction peaks at 18.7° and 22.7° showed a relatively high intensity among all NBR/EUG composites, which indicated that most of the EUG crystals in NBR/EUG composites were β-form crystals. 25,26 Different temperatures facilitated the formation of α and β crystals during the isothermal crystallization of EUG, in which α crystal displayed a thermodynamic stable form and β crystal showed a metastable form. Thus, β crystals were produced easily at a fast cooling rate during the non-isothermal crystallization of EUG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of these diffraction peaks was attributed to the existing crystals of EUG (containing aand b-form crystalline structures) in NBR matrix, in which the peak of the a-form crystalline structure of EUG was at 22.7 and the peaks of the b-form crystalline structure of EUG were at 18.7 and 22.7 23,24. Notably, the diffraction peak at 22.7 displayed a low intensity while the diffraction peaks at 18.7 and 22.7 showed a relatively high intensity among all NBR/EUG composites, which indicated that most of the EUG crystals in NBR/EUG composites were b-form crystals 25,26. Different temperatures facilitated the formation of a and b crystals during the isothermal crystallization of EUG, in which a crystal displayed a thermodynamic stable form and b crystal showed a metastable form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the α-type crystallization peak of EUG was mainly at 2θ = 26.6°, while no crystallization peak appeared at about 2θ = 26.6° (as shown in Figure 4 b) [ 31 , 32 ], proving that the crystal type of EUG in various MPU/EUG composites is mainly β-type crystals. In reality, the forming of α-type crystals was not only related to the crystallization temperature but was also affected by the heating rate, so the forming conditions of α-type crystals were stricter than that of β-type crystals [ 33 , 34 ]. In contrast, the crystallization temperature of β-type crystals was relatively low and its forming conditions were simple [ 33 , 35 ]; hence, the existed crystals in the MPU/EUG composites were mainly β-type crystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%