“…In this case, on the one hand, the chemical composition is constant, and all differences in the physical properties, including thermodynamic parameters, depend entirely on the differences in the crystal structures and can be compared directly. − On the other hand, even if several polymorphic or isomeric coordination compounds are reported, in most cases their thermodynamic relations are usually not investigated. − Sometimes conclusions on the stability were drawn based on the comparison of the densities, the fact that one form transforms into another or by computational methods. − In other cases, crystals of two modifications were obtained, and one of these forms can be prepared pure, whereas no access to the other form was found, and thus, it is concluded that the latter, frequently called “disappearing polymorph”, is metastable, which is not necessarily the case. Finally, these results are sometimes discussed in context of the crystal structure, where, for example, some short intermolecular contacts are held to be responsible for the stability of a given form. , All these might be incomplete because for definite conclusions the exact thermodynamic relations must be known, which for coordination compounds is difficult to investigate. In contrast to organic compounds, usually no melting or polymorphic transition is observable, and therefore, helpful thermodynamic rules like the heat of transition, the melting enthalpy or melting entropy rule cannot be used. − Therefore, there are only a few examples where the thermodynamic relations of coordination compounds are investigated in more detail. ,− In some cases, the transformation of one form into the other is observed by, for example, X-ray diffraction.…”