2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population density, socioeconomic environment and all-cause mortality: A multilevel survival analysis of 2.7 million individuals in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they [11] examined whether areal socio-economic status and population density affected cardiovascular mortality in a prospective study of a Swedish parish; results showed that after controlling for individual factors, population density had the dominant effect on mortality. A similar prospective study on all-cause mortality was replicated for all of Denmark [12]: findings suggested that population density was a more consistent contextual indicator than was areal socio-economic variables after controlling for individual factors through multilevel survival analysis. In both cases, higher population density was associated with higher mortality, supporting the ‘urban penalty’ hypothesis that life characteristics in urbanised areas, such as higher exposure to environmental pollution, individualistic lifestyles, and unhealthy behaviours (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, they [11] examined whether areal socio-economic status and population density affected cardiovascular mortality in a prospective study of a Swedish parish; results showed that after controlling for individual factors, population density had the dominant effect on mortality. A similar prospective study on all-cause mortality was replicated for all of Denmark [12]: findings suggested that population density was a more consistent contextual indicator than was areal socio-economic variables after controlling for individual factors through multilevel survival analysis. In both cases, higher population density was associated with higher mortality, supporting the ‘urban penalty’ hypothesis that life characteristics in urbanised areas, such as higher exposure to environmental pollution, individualistic lifestyles, and unhealthy behaviours (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The health disparities between urban and rural areas have also been considered an important aspect of contextual differences in health [11], [12]. Urbanicity/rurality is often measured using a simple census variable, such as population density [11], [12], or through administratively defined regional divisions [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In supplementary analysis, we included the number of persons living in the municipality, which is the only indicator of the environment that was available in the data. The population size, or rather the closely related population density, might be expected to affect the socio-demographic characteristics as well as mortality (Chaix et al, 2006;Meijer et al, 2012b). However, it turned out to be a completely unimportant control variable.…”
Section: How Much Of the Geographical Mortality Variation Is Explainementioning
confidence: 99%