2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genetics and mutational events at 6 Y-STRs in Korean population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a population model of exponential growth from an initially constant-sized population with the settings and priors described previously (Xue, Zerjal, et al 2006), except for the mutation rate. Three sets of mutation rates were compared: 1) an “observed” mutation rate (OMR) for each Y-STR compiled from previously described mutation counts in father–son pairs (Dupuy et al 2004; Gusmao et al 2005; Lee et al 2007; Shi et al 2007; Decker et al 2008; Padilla-Gutierrez et al 2008; Toscanini et al 2008; Goedbloed et al 2009; Kim et al 2009) or in deep-rooted pedigrees (Vermeulen et al 2009) tabulated in supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material Online. 2) A widely used calibrated “evolutionary” mutation rate (EMR) based on well-dated historical events (Zhivotovsky et al 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a population model of exponential growth from an initially constant-sized population with the settings and priors described previously (Xue, Zerjal, et al 2006), except for the mutation rate. Three sets of mutation rates were compared: 1) an “observed” mutation rate (OMR) for each Y-STR compiled from previously described mutation counts in father–son pairs (Dupuy et al 2004; Gusmao et al 2005; Lee et al 2007; Shi et al 2007; Decker et al 2008; Padilla-Gutierrez et al 2008; Toscanini et al 2008; Goedbloed et al 2009; Kim et al 2009) or in deep-rooted pedigrees (Vermeulen et al 2009) tabulated in supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material Online. 2) A widely used calibrated “evolutionary” mutation rate (EMR) based on well-dated historical events (Zhivotovsky et al 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%