Port risk management and Public Private Partnerships: factors relating to risk allocation and risk sustainability

Handley-Schachler, Morrison; Navare, Jyoti

doi:10.1504/writr.2010.031585

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All activities are potentially disrupted since the activities are conducted by person. Stevedoring activities are already risky before the pandemic due to container weight failure and it may disrupts port schedule (Heikkila, 2018) and increasing the risk of safety incident (Schachler & Navare, 2010), as the pandemic started it is affected since there is a restrictions to reduce staff at work and both operations might be disrupted. Same thing applies to truck availability and warehouse activity (Alyami, 2014), due to the restrictions there were no truck drivers available and the goods are piled up in the warehouse.…”

Section: House Of Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

WITHDRAWN: The analysis of disruption management due to COVID-19 using business continuity management and house of risk on maritime operations

Budiyanto

Gurning

Pitana

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high frequency of shipping in Indonesia is directly proportional to the increase of port activities. Along with the activities, the risk of disruption that might occur also increase. The impact of a disruption can be detrimental to many parties such as crew, company, ship, cargo carried, and environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ports are encouraged to develop a plan that could minimize the disruption of the role that port play in keeping trade flowing and vital supplies moving. The possible impact from COVID-19 related disruption urges companies to apply the Business Continuity Management (BCM) system to deal with any potential disruption that might occur. This paper tries to identify and rank each potential disruption from COVID-19 based on severity & occurrence, House of Risk method was used with the aid of questionnaires and interviews. Furthermore, business impact analysis is conducted in order to analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and how BCM helps to minimize the potential loss. Business continuity value also measured through analysing container throughput growth data.

show abstract

Section: House Of Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

WITHDRAWN: The analysis of disruption management due to COVID-19 using business continuity management and house of risk on maritime operations

Budiyanto

Gurning

Pitana

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Villalba-Romero et al [22] indicated that the environmental perspective of sustainability shows great importance during the operation and maintenance stages. Combining the three levels, Schachler and Navare [23] used the reasonable governance framework and contract structure to achieve effective the identification and distribution of risks, further ensureing the sustainable development of PPP projects.…”

Section: Ppp Projects From the Sustainability Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective

Jing

Jin

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Capital is key to achieve the standardized operation of public–private partnership (PPP) projects. The capital structure of PPP projects stresses the structure of equity and debt funds, which are important for securing life-cycle ample funds and achieving the expected outcomes of projects. By incorporating sustainability into PPP projects, the capital structure not only secures current needs of funds, it also focuses on life-cycle stable operations and achieves economic, social, and environmental benefits. This study first set the equity–debt ratio and equity investment ratio of the private sector as the dependent variables and built a selection model of the capital structure of PPP projects from a sustainability perspective using the benefit, cost, and project conditions as core factors based on multi-objective programming and a discounted cash-flow model. Then, the qualitative analysis could be achieved according to the analysis of critical factors that had not been calculated. Afterwards, a selection process which combined the multi-objective programming model with qualitative analysis was proposed to achieve a comprehensive selection of the capital structure of PPP projects from the sustainability perspective. Finally, the process was applied to a real project to verify its rationality and usability. This study not only enriches the theoretical research of PPP projects and provides a new idea on which to build the capital structure selection model, it also proposes a selection process that can provide scientific references for the selection and optimization of the capital structure of PPP projects in practice.

show abstract

Port Knowledge Risk Management

Handley-Schachler

2020

Management for Professionals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Port risk management and Public Private Partnerships: factors relating to risk allocation and risk sustainability

Cited by 12 publications

References 26 publications

WITHDRAWN: The analysis of disruption management due to COVID-19 using business continuity management and house of risk on maritime operations

WITHDRAWN: The analysis of disruption management due to COVID-19 using business continuity management and house of risk on maritime operations

Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective

Port Knowledge Risk Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About