2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron emission tomography in spinal infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 34 Positron emission tomography might be an alternative in undetermined cases following the prior mentioned diagnostical tools. 35 In undetermined cases, CT guided biopsy might offer a possible solution. 36 Alternative or additional diagnosis, including aseptic implant loosening, spinal tissue infection without implant involvement and skin infections like erysipelas should be excluded at any stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 Positron emission tomography might be an alternative in undetermined cases following the prior mentioned diagnostical tools. 35 In undetermined cases, CT guided biopsy might offer a possible solution. 36 Alternative or additional diagnosis, including aseptic implant loosening, spinal tissue infection without implant involvement and skin infections like erysipelas should be excluded at any stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG is an unspecific tracer that reflects high glucose metabolism [2]. It has a fast distribution in the body, even in tissues with a low perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) as a highly sensitive method in diagnosing spinal infections [2][3][4]. The technique J ournal of…”
Section: Several Studies Have Proved the Value Of 18f-fluorodeoxyglucmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Published data indicate that [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT is superior to 67 Ga for the diagnosis of spinal infection and paraspinal soft tissue infection [82], and should be used in selected cases as an alternative to MRI [3,61,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109]. All studies in which a comparison between MRI and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT was performed have shown that a combination of the two techniques detects spinal infection in 100% of patients [102,110,111].…”
Section: Influence Of Medicationmentioning
confidence: 99%