2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3628-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible different roles of exercise in preventing vertebral and hip fractures

Abstract: Dear Editor, In postmenopausal women, a recent 16-year follow-up analysis of the Erlangen Fitness and Osteoporosis Prevention Study (EFOPS) by Kemmler and colleagues [1] showed significantly fewer major osteoporotic fractures including vertebral and hip fractures in the exercise group compared to the control group (rate ratio 0.37, 95 % confidence interval 0.14 to 0.88, p = .027). This is important evidence demonstrating that longterm multipurpose exercise programs can reduce low-trauma fracture risk in older … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High bone mass in patients with sclerostin deficiency is present throughout the skeleton, including non-weight-bearing regions, such as the face and skull (40), indicating that anti-sclerostin antibodies are not agents that decrease the mechanical strain threshold for bone modeling; treatment with an anti-sclerostin antibody is highly efficacious even under conditions with impaired physical activity (5054), whereas enhancing skeletal response to physical activity cannot effectively improve bone fragility caused by reduced skeletal loading. Accordingly, treatment with an anti-sclerostin antibody is likely to strengthen the skeleton, without any specific direction in contrast to exercise, to prevent fall-related fractures such as in the hip (55). …”
Section: Stimulating Mechanical Strain-related Bone Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High bone mass in patients with sclerostin deficiency is present throughout the skeleton, including non-weight-bearing regions, such as the face and skull (40), indicating that anti-sclerostin antibodies are not agents that decrease the mechanical strain threshold for bone modeling; treatment with an anti-sclerostin antibody is highly efficacious even under conditions with impaired physical activity (5054), whereas enhancing skeletal response to physical activity cannot effectively improve bone fragility caused by reduced skeletal loading. Accordingly, treatment with an anti-sclerostin antibody is likely to strengthen the skeleton, without any specific direction in contrast to exercise, to prevent fall-related fractures such as in the hip (55). …”
Section: Stimulating Mechanical Strain-related Bone Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%