2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3587186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential barrier of graphene edges

Abstract: We calculated row resolved density of states, charge distribution and work function of graphene's zigzag and armchair edge (either clean or terminated alternatively with H, O or OH group).The zigzag edge saturated via OH group has the lowest work function of 3.76 eV, while the zigzag edge terminated via O has the highest work function of 7.74 eV. The angle-dependent potential barrier on the edge is fitted to a multi-pole model and is explained by the charge distribution.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a clear boundary of GO is easily found in the SP map, implying that the edges of GO sheets show relatively lower SP compared to the in-plane smooth surface as marked by arrows in Figure 3(b). It is well known that the local work function of graphene would increase with the present of vacancy or unsaturated bonds (28). The low SP values at the edges of GO are suggested to be attributed to the relatively larger amount of unsaturated bonds, which is in good agreement with the widely reports of First-principles calculations results (29,30).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…First, a clear boundary of GO is easily found in the SP map, implying that the edges of GO sheets show relatively lower SP compared to the in-plane smooth surface as marked by arrows in Figure 3(b). It is well known that the local work function of graphene would increase with the present of vacancy or unsaturated bonds (28). The low SP values at the edges of GO are suggested to be attributed to the relatively larger amount of unsaturated bonds, which is in good agreement with the widely reports of First-principles calculations results (29,30).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The fit using the Simmons model is plotted (black dashed line) along with the data in is common for the Simmons model when applied to small junctions (e.g. Au nanogaps) but could also include a barrier lowering due to water or OH groups absorbed at the gap edge [34][35][36]. While the barrier height has been found to deviate from the expected value, scanning tunneling microscopy studies of Au nanogaps have shown a consistency between the extracted gap size from the Simmons fit and the actual electrode separation [37].…”
Section: Electroburning Of As-exfoliated Flakes Often Results In Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies on the peculiar edge properties of graphene. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The zigzag edge (Z-edge) and armchair edge (A-edge) being the most studied edges have drastically different electronic properties. The Z-edge can sustain edge states and resonances that are not present in the A-edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%