2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2012.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential impact of PET/CT on the initial staging of lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Kamel et al . [ 22 ] who conducted their study on 37 patients, obtained similar results and supported this theory, as of 29 extranodal sites shown by standard reference, PET/CT was able to correctly determine 24 while PET and CT correctly detected only 15 and 16, respectively. The performance of PET/CT was significantly better in detecting extranodal lesions than PET ( P = 0.016) and CT ( P = 0.03).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Furthermore, Kamel et al . [ 22 ] who conducted their study on 37 patients, obtained similar results and supported this theory, as of 29 extranodal sites shown by standard reference, PET/CT was able to correctly determine 24 while PET and CT correctly detected only 15 and 16, respectively. The performance of PET/CT was significantly better in detecting extranodal lesions than PET ( P = 0.016) and CT ( P = 0.03).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The oncologists, especially for patients with HL uses critical parameters such as anamnesis, detailed physical examination, laboratory findings, imaging modalities (X-ray, CT scan, and PET-CT) and bone marrow biopsy results for early diagnosis, evaluation of response given to treatment, staging or restaging. [15][16] [17][18][19] [20] studies indicate that PET-CT imaging approach offers more successful outcomes in the process of deciding the stage of lymphoma disease compared to other approaches. All these approaches applied for the diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed with HL may cause anxiety on patients or radiation-based methods may produce undesirable results in the long term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%