1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1969.tb01460.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Value of Four Early Developmental Milestones in Screening Children for Increased Risk of Later Retardation

Abstract: SUMMARY Children later excluded from normal school on account of mental defect, cerebral palsy or deafness, show a significant delay in passing the milestones of sitting and walking unsupported, and using sentences; the use of single words provides less reliable information. Children later admitted to normal schools show a significant relationship between delay in walking and using sentences and a low IQ at the age of 5 years, which reaches a practical level of specificity when the information for both milesto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm previous reports (IUingworth, 1968;Neligan & Prudham, 1969) concerning the lack of predictive value of motor delay for later mental retardation, even though a postural delay is frequently outlined in mentally handicapped children, most of all in the lowest IQ subgroups (IUingworth, 1961;Molnar, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results confirm previous reports (IUingworth, 1968;Neligan & Prudham, 1969) concerning the lack of predictive value of motor delay for later mental retardation, even though a postural delay is frequently outlined in mentally handicapped children, most of all in the lowest IQ subgroups (IUingworth, 1961;Molnar, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A similar type of skewing was noted by Frankenburg and Dodds (1967) for all their items; by Hindley (1968) and Hindley et al (1966) for walking; and by Miller et al (1960) for their two speech milestones. Its possible practical significance is discussed elsewhere (Neligan and Prudham 1969); but the skewing provides one good reason for reporting the results in terms of percentiles rather than means and standard deviations. Another advantage is that this brings them into line with the standard height and weight charts with which clinical workers are familiar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%