2021
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1930121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and conflict in network governance: exclusive and inclusive forms of network administrative organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Network governance is deemed most suitable to deal with complex problems cutting across policy sectors and disciplines. This is because single organizational actors cannot address various problems and meet their goals independently due to a lack of resources [21] Network governance then becomes a specific style of politics that is aimed at resolving two interrelated problems. First, it includes demands for inclusion and participation to overcome distrust of public agencies and a crisis of legitimacy.…”
Section: The Concept Of Network Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network governance is deemed most suitable to deal with complex problems cutting across policy sectors and disciplines. This is because single organizational actors cannot address various problems and meet their goals independently due to a lack of resources [21] Network governance then becomes a specific style of politics that is aimed at resolving two interrelated problems. First, it includes demands for inclusion and participation to overcome distrust of public agencies and a crisis of legitimacy.…”
Section: The Concept Of Network Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional design is defined as the set of "rules, interaction patterns, and stable patterns of perception that can influence the interaction" within the network, and includes fundamental characteristics of the whole network such as rules for access to crucial resources and power relations among the actors (Klijn & Koppenjan, 2015). In particular, (1) access rules consider the process of activation or deactivation of actors in a network; (2) the management of information is key for changing the balance of power in the network since information strategies can help external actors to both enter the network and influence network decisions; (3) actors' formal role is crucial to improve the chances for newcomers to challenge existing players in the flux of network interactions, for example by participating in policy committees, institutionalized policy venues or authoritative decision arenas (Ingold & Leifeld, 2016;Maron & Benish, 2021).…”
Section: Network Characteristics and Related Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, diverging interests and resources among network actors influence the evolution of a network platform [21]. Others have shown that network actors use power strategies to deal with other members' opposing views, leading to less-inclusive platform types [22].…”
Section: The Enabling Role Of Network Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%