2015
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1052735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and resistance: leading change in medical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partnership working can challenge accepted roles and practices and evoke feelings of vulnerability and risk (Bovill, 2014). The general reluctance to expend time and energy in such work may be related to an underlying resistance to change amongst an academic community that is adjusting to loss of autonomy, "change fatigue," and increased managerialism (Sundberg, Josephson, Reeves, & Nordquist, 2017). Disciplinary cultures and practices will impact staff perspectives of and willingness to engage with partnership working.…”
Section: Staff Perspectives Of Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partnership working can challenge accepted roles and practices and evoke feelings of vulnerability and risk (Bovill, 2014). The general reluctance to expend time and energy in such work may be related to an underlying resistance to change amongst an academic community that is adjusting to loss of autonomy, "change fatigue," and increased managerialism (Sundberg, Josephson, Reeves, & Nordquist, 2017). Disciplinary cultures and practices will impact staff perspectives of and willingness to engage with partnership working.…”
Section: Staff Perspectives Of Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the researcher is not solely on the phenomenon or the individual but instead on the dialogue between the individual and the context (Van der Mescht, 2004); the researcher is the actively engaged and subjective research process facilitator (Illing, 2010). The paper presents data from a Ph.D. study which explores issues related to leading change in health professions education with the starting point in the two sensitizing concepts of power and resistance (Sundberg et al, 2015;Sundberg, Josephson, Reeves, & Nordquist, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to change is to be aware of how IPE is articulated and thought of (Ward et al, 2017) as well as confronting underlying assumptions about IPE (Ginsburg & Tregunno, 2005). Even though these issues of resistance to educational change are closely connected to power (Sundberg, Josephson, Reeves, & Nordquist, 2015), there has been a lack of attention on exploring issues of power within the interprofessional field (Baker, Egan-Lee, Martimianakis & Reeves, 2011;Paradise & Whitehead, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sundberg and colleagues16 define leadership relevant to medical education leadership as ‘ the ability to cope with change in an organisation, setting a direction, aligning people and motivating and inspiring’ (p446). The literature describes three distinct healthcare leadership communication styles, being transactional, servant and transformational.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching medical students to cope with change, prioritise, be humble, and work in and lead/inspire a team, are, at a minimum, effective strategies for working in an interprofessional health setting 16. Medical schools can begin teaching these traits to invest in the leadership growth of a student early on, with strategies to evaluate these medical leadership competencies 17 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%