2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power system flexibility assessment — State of the art

Abstract: Titleþÿ P o w e r s y s t e m f l e x i b i l i t y a s s e s s m e n t S t a t e o f t h e a r t Abstract-Recent research has led to the development of a number of metrics for the assessment of flexibility in a power system. This paper presents an overview of the tools currently available to those involved in planning and operations to directly incorporate the assessment of the requirements for flexibility, the flexibility resource available in each system and methodologies to assess the overall flexibility o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of (6), the uncertainty in problem (7)-(9) is , which is characterized by a given uncertainty set , where and are a zero and all-ones vectors, respectively, with the same dimension as . As a result, we transform the non-standard robust optimization problem (1)-(3) into a standard robust problem (7)- (9). If the objective function is a linear or concave function, problem (7)-(9) can be solved by using the approaches proposed in [28] and [29] for continuous corrective action such as dispatch and AGC control or, alternatively, the algorithm proposed in [32] for discrete corrective action, such as unit commitment and transmission line switching.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of (6), the uncertainty in problem (7)-(9) is , which is characterized by a given uncertainty set , where and are a zero and all-ones vectors, respectively, with the same dimension as . As a result, we transform the non-standard robust optimization problem (1)-(3) into a standard robust problem (7)- (9). If the objective function is a linear or concave function, problem (7)-(9) can be solved by using the approaches proposed in [28] and [29] for continuous corrective action such as dispatch and AGC control or, alternatively, the algorithm proposed in [32] for discrete corrective action, such as unit commitment and transmission line switching.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One focuses on long-term planning while the other targets real-time operations. A comprehensive review of the research on both long and short-term flexibility metrics is performed in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this date, there are very few methodologies that have been proposed to assess the overall flexibility in power systems. They are surveyed in [43]. The main implication here is that flexibility consideration in long-term planning may change the optimal mix of resources to be invested in [44].…”
Section: Long-term Flexibility Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of power system flexibility researchers have investigated how to define power system flexibility and flexibility metrics [3][4][5][6], how to evaluate it [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and which resources can provide flexibility [15,16]. Basically, the flexibility resources focus on demand side resources [17][18][19], energy storage [20][21][22][23], advanced energy conversion technologies [24,25], and so on.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%