2013
DOI: 10.1142/s0578563413500113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Methods of Estimating Tilting Failure of Caisson Breakwaters Using a Monte-Carlo Simulation

Abstract: The authors propose a new method to estimate the tilting failure of caisson breakwaters, using a Monte-Carlo simulation that can quantitatively and stochastically estimate failure probability. An index, referred to as "Expected Frequency Exceeding of a Critical Load (EFEC)" that expresses the potential tilting failure probability of caisson breakwaters is proposed and adopted in this model. Application of the model to 40 breakwaters in Japan reveals that the threshold value of EFEC that specifies whether a cai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, Level 1 and Level 2 probabilistic analyses have been developed, while Level 3 has been successfully carried out in Japan [19]. Notably, the Level 1 and Level 2 reliability design methods are based on the mean value first-order second-moment (MVFOSM), and first-order reliability method (FORM), respectively [11,12], whereas the Level 3 reliability design method is related to the estimation of the caisson sliding distance [18,19,21,22] or the expectation of damages occurring in the armor blocks of horizontal composite BRWs [23]. In this study, the safety of nine typical Korean vertical BRWs is estimated using different reliability analysis methods, MVFOSM, FORM, and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, Level 1 and Level 2 probabilistic analyses have been developed, while Level 3 has been successfully carried out in Japan [19]. Notably, the Level 1 and Level 2 reliability design methods are based on the mean value first-order second-moment (MVFOSM), and first-order reliability method (FORM), respectively [11,12], whereas the Level 3 reliability design method is related to the estimation of the caisson sliding distance [18,19,21,22] or the expectation of damages occurring in the armor blocks of horizontal composite BRWs [23]. In this study, the safety of nine typical Korean vertical BRWs is estimated using different reliability analysis methods, MVFOSM, FORM, and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%