Practical use artificial intelligence in criminal proceeding

Abstract

Artificial intelligence a set of scientific methods, theories and techniques whose aim is to reproduce, by a machine, the cognitive abilities of human beings. The artificial intelligence system is capable of using big data, calculating, evaluating, studying, deductive reasoning, abstract analysis and forecasting. The speed of information processing by artificial intelligence and its efficiency in making procedural decisions creates a model for digital automation of procedural decisions. The purpose of the article is to investigate the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial systems of developed countries and to analyze the prospects for its use in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Such automation simplifies the process of making similar decisions in similar proceedings, which, of course, increases efficiency and simplifies procedural decision-making process in terms of procedural cost savings. Modern developments seek to ensure that machines perform complex tasks that were previously performed by humans. In the near future, accompanying organizational measures for the implementation of artificial intelligence and its regulatory support in public authorities associated with the storage of big data, processing information based on mathematical algorithms and making decisions based on artificial intelligence will be an integral part of our society. Artificial intelligence technologies are already being implemented in the judicial systems of China, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, France and Argentina. In the near future, the chances of using such technologies in the courts of general jurisdiction of Ukraine and in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine can be assessed as extremely high, and its scope is not limited to the work of artificial intelligence in court. You can also talk about the work of artificial intelligence in the activities of the prosecutor and the police. The paper deals with the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial systems of developed countries and analyzes the prospects of its use in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. These systems are reviewed, as: COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) - United States of America, HART (Harm Assessment Risk Tool) - United Kingdom, Prometea - Argentina, Compulsory Similar Cases Search and Reporting Mechanism - China. The advantages of artificial intelligence systems are analyzed and a critique of their use is noted.

Legal status of sabbot and responsibility to humanity

“…Також він стверджує, що у світі існує низка юридичних сервісів/систем, що використовують штучний інтелект: 1) у Франції -Doctrine.fr (пошукова система), Predictice (аналітика, крім кримінальних справ), Case Law Analytics (аналітика, крім кримінальних справ), Juris Data Analytics -LexisNexis (пошукова система, аналітика, крім кримінальних справ); 2) у Великій Британії -Luminance (аналітика), HART -Harm Assessment Risk Tool (аналітика, кримінальні справи, оцінювання ризику шкоди); 3) у США -Watson/Ross -IBM (аналітика), Lex Machina -LexisNexis (аналі-тика), COMPAS -Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions використовуються судами США для оцінювання ймовірності скоєння підсудним рецидиву зло-чинів та аналізу попередніх проступків; 4) в Аргентині -Prometea (аналітика, ци-вільні та адміністративні справи); 5) у Китайській Народній Республіці -Compulsory Similar Cases Search and Reporting Mechanism (аналітика) застосовується у Верховному народному суді Китайської Народної Республіки. Найбільш потужні системи з визначеного переліку працюють у судах і поліції та допомагають суддям приймати процесуальні рішення [12].…”