2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2017.2749558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Modeling of Magnetically Biased Graphene Through a Recursive Convolutional FDTD Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with this research process, new methods are much in demand to model-based electronic devices based on the magnetized graphene [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In most of the numerical methods, magnetized graphene is usually incorporated in the algorithm by transforming the surface conductivity to a volumetric conductivity by dividing the thickness of the graphene, which might introduce a multiscale computational problem in simulation, require massive CPU time and memory, and make the optimization process tiresome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with this research process, new methods are much in demand to model-based electronic devices based on the magnetized graphene [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In most of the numerical methods, magnetized graphene is usually incorporated in the algorithm by transforming the surface conductivity to a volumetric conductivity by dividing the thickness of the graphene, which might introduce a multiscale computational problem in simulation, require massive CPU time and memory, and make the optimization process tiresome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, two main methods have been reported to establish the electromagnetic model for investigating the interaction between the electromagnetic field and the graphene. In one method, graphene is regarded as a two-dimensional (2-D) conductive sheet [3][4][5][6][7][8]; in the other method, graphene is treated as a bulk material [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Based on the first method with graphene as a 2-D sheet, Sounas et al successfully obtained the analytic expressions of the reflection and transmission coefficients when a plane wave obliquely incidents on a magnetostatic biased graphene sheet in free space [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significantly enhances the difficulty of analytic modeling, and thus leads to a fact that the numerical algorithms (e.g. the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm) are mainly adopted when graphene is regarded as a bulk material [9][10][11][12]. However, the ultra-thin nature of the graphene would inevitably increases the numbers of grids (and thus degrading the simulation efficiency) for the conventional FDTD algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetized graphene is an infinitesimally thin sheet biased by a magnetostatic field and behaves as an anisotropic conducting sheet characterized by a conductivity tensor [1,2]. For the modeling of magnetized graphene, a number of numerical methods have already been developed to quantify the anisotropic properties of graphene such the method of moments (MOM) [3], finite difference time domain (FDTD) [4][5][6] method, and partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) method [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each method has its advantages and drawbacks [8]. FDTD modeling of magnetized graphene has been addressed in earlier works [4][5][6]. In [6], an FDTD approach is developed by transforming the surface conductivity of graphene to a volumetric conductivity by dividing the thickness of graphene and implementing it by using the auxiliary differential equation (ADE) and matrix exponential method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%