2017
DOI: 10.33012/2017.15123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) using Low-Cost and Ultra-Low-Cost GNSS Receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
23
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reveal that the C/N0 of smartphone measurements is about 9.4 dB-Hz lower with respect to the Javad receiver. These results are in line with the conclusions drawn by Zhang et al (2018a), Gill et al (2017) and Liu et al (2019) who showed that C/N0 of raw smartphone measurements are in general 7.5-10 dB-Hz lower comparing to the high-grade hardware. Figure 4 presents C/N0 values with respect to the satellite elevation angle.…”
Section: Satellite Signal Power Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reveal that the C/N0 of smartphone measurements is about 9.4 dB-Hz lower with respect to the Javad receiver. These results are in line with the conclusions drawn by Zhang et al (2018a), Gill et al (2017) and Liu et al (2019) who showed that C/N0 of raw smartphone measurements are in general 7.5-10 dB-Hz lower comparing to the high-grade hardware. Figure 4 presents C/N0 values with respect to the satellite elevation angle.…”
Section: Satellite Signal Power Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In such a case, it was likely to obtain centimeter-level accuracy. Gill et al (2017) analyzed single-frequency precise point positioning (PPP) and achieved the accuracy of several decimeters. To follow on that, an important study was recently conducted by Zhang et al (2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise positioning with Android devices has also been assessed by Gill et al (2017), Navarro-Gallardo et al (2017, Pirazzi et al (2017), and Zhang et al (2018). These studies draw similar conclusions about positioning performance and raw data characteristics as the above-mentioned studies.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The achieved accuracy of said receivers are now comparable with survey-grade receivers albeit with limitations. Some PPP and GNSS studies have already tested single-frequency [12,[16][17], dual-frequency [18], and triple-frequency [19] low-cost receivers that usually utilizes the GPS system and their results showed encouraging results. In this study, MADOCA-LEX was tested in a low-cost receiver, u-blox C099 ZED-F9P, and compared to the performance of survey-grade receivers in a post-processed solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%