2018
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1524176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting aboveground biomass in Arctic landscapes using very high spatial resolution satellite imagery and field sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2011) and Räsänen et al. (2019a), and it fits well with classifications presented in Chapin et al. (1996).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2011) and Räsänen et al. (2019a), and it fits well with classifications presented in Chapin et al. (1996).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2017; Räsänen et al. 2019a), has evident fine‐scale heterogeneity in wetness and trophic status patterns. However, the transitions between different vegetation and microforms are more gradual than in Kaamanen and the low strings dominated by Sphagnum and evergreen shrubs are only some decimeters above the wet flarks dominated by wet brown mosses and some graminoids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high Arctic, however, shrubs growing in extremely harsh conditions keep most of their biomass below ground and little is known about the processes of internal growth allocation. Classical measurements of tundra greening based on estimations of canopy cover changes (Atkinson and Treitz, 2013; Beck and Goetz, 2011; Berner et al, 2018; Buchhorn et al, 2013; Greaves et al, 2016; Räsänen et al, 2019) are not sufficient to answer questions regarding the complicated nature of arctic plants’ internal responses to climate change, so a frontier of high-latitude dendrochronology has been the exploration of growth allocation processes above and below ground in terms of the physiology of high Arctic shrubs (Buchwal et al, 2013; Le Moullec et al, 2019; Ropars et al, 2017). Recent studies suggest that shrub response to growing temperatures might be higher than is estimated from above ground canopy cover alone and is heterogeneous across different tundra ecosystems (Bret-Harte et al, 2002; Campioli et al, 2012; Elmendorf et al, 2012a, 2012b; Havström et al, 1993; Hill and Henry, 2011; Hudson and Henry 2009, 2010; Jones et al, 1997; Shaver et al, 2001).…”
Section: Nontraditional Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the change in AGB between PFTs can be caused by changing species contributions within PFTs. However, many studies of Arctic and sub-Arctic regions present AGB state or change at a PFT level (Räsänen et al, 2018;Berner et al, 2018;Webb et al, 2017;Walker et al, 2003). Some focus only on shrub biomass of one or more species (Vankoughnett and Grogan, 2015;Berner et al, 2018), while others focus on tree biomass (Berner et al, 2012) or on species and PFT AGB of one specific community (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%