2007
DOI: 10.1080/10409280701610796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Early School Achievement With the EDI: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
90
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Forget-Dubois et al (2007) explored the short-term predictive validity of the EDI, along with a battery of tests of school readiness and cognition, in the prediction of Grade 1 academic outcomes. EDI ratings explained 23% of the variance in Grade 1 achievement beyond the 13% explained by age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES).…”
Section: The Early Development Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forget-Dubois et al (2007) explored the short-term predictive validity of the EDI, along with a battery of tests of school readiness and cognition, in the prediction of Grade 1 academic outcomes. EDI ratings explained 23% of the variance in Grade 1 achievement beyond the 13% explained by age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES).…”
Section: The Early Development Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence on the construct and concurrent validity of the EDI in Canada was reported by Janus and Offord (2007). Additionally Forget-Dubois et al (2007) explored the EDI's predictive validity over a 1-year period and demonstrated that kindergarten EDI scores shared as much variance with children's achievement in Grade 1 as direct cognitive assessment. Guhn et al (2007) use of differential item functioning analyses on Canadian EDI data for 40,000 children indicated no item-level bias on the EDI in relation to children's gender, English-as-a-Second-Language status, or Aboriginal status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Selon Piotrkowski, Botsko et Matthews (2000), les enseignants seraient de meilleurs juges que les professionnels de la consultation en milieu scolaire parce qu'ils évaluent les enfants à partir de multiples situations d'apprentissage et d'interactions sociales vécues en classe. Plus récemment, Forget-Dubois, Lemelin, Boivin, Ginette, Séguin et Vitaro (2007) ont montré que la validité prédictive des mesures de l'Instrument de mesure du développement de la petite enfance par rapport au rendement scolaire en 1 re année est similaire à celles d'une batterie de tests cognitifs administrée par des évaluateurs indépendants.…”
Section: Instrumentationunclassified