1991
DOI: 10.2307/1311562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Ecosystem Responses to Elevated CO2Concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
152
2
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
152
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative feedback of biogeochemical processes on vegetation distribution is still poorly understood (Neilson and Running, 1996). Therefore, a major problem when using these models to simulate the potential response of vegetation to a doubled-CO 2 climatic scenario is their inability to address the direct effects of CO 2 on vegetation (Norby et al, 1992;Mooney et al, 1991). The more recent achievement of incorporating the effects of CO 2 on NPP, leaf-area-index (LAI), water balance, and competition between C 3 and C 4 plants Prentice, 1996, 1997;Neilson, 1995, Woodward et al, 1995 in models provide some hope.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative feedback of biogeochemical processes on vegetation distribution is still poorly understood (Neilson and Running, 1996). Therefore, a major problem when using these models to simulate the potential response of vegetation to a doubled-CO 2 climatic scenario is their inability to address the direct effects of CO 2 on vegetation (Norby et al, 1992;Mooney et al, 1991). The more recent achievement of incorporating the effects of CO 2 on NPP, leaf-area-index (LAI), water balance, and competition between C 3 and C 4 plants Prentice, 1996, 1997;Neilson, 1995, Woodward et al, 1995 in models provide some hope.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration may affect natural ecosystems by directly influencing plant growth and photochemistry due to an increased photosynthetic rate, especially in C 3 plants (Islam et al, 1996;Das et al, 2002). In spite of increased plant growth under elevated CO 2 concentrations (Bazzaz, 1990;Mooney et al, 1991;Amthor, 2001), aerial plant parts accumulate generally less nitrogen (N), and carbon (C)/N ratio increases (Baxter et al, 1994;Epron et al, 1996), which could influence plant secondary metabolites synthesis and concentration. GSs, as N-and C-containing secondary metabolites, might be affected by atmospheric CO 2 enrichment owing to changes in the plant's C supply and N content (Cotrufo et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While thousands of papers have been published on the impacts of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on plants and plant communities (Mooney et al, 1991;Bazzaz and Fajer, 1992;Bowes, 1993;Curtis et al, 1994;Mooney and Koch, 1994;Drake et al, 1997), trees and forests have generally been underrepresented in the CO 2 literature (Ceulemans and Mousseau, 1994;Scarascia-Mugnozza et al, 2001). Nevertheless, a growing body of excellent reviews has been published in the past 8 years about the impacts of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on forest trees and forest ecosystems (Ceulemans and Mousseau, 1994;Curtis, 1996;Curtis and Wang, 1998;Saxe et al, 1998;Norby et al, 1999;Karnosky et al, 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%