2019
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0035-19.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Perceptual Decisions Using Visual Cortical Population Responses and Choice History

Abstract: Our understanding of the neural basis of perceptual decision making has been built in part on relating co-fluctuations of single neuron responses to perceptual decisions on a trial-by-trial basis. The strength of this relationship is often compared across neurons or brain areas, recorded in different sessions, animals, or variants of a task. We sought to extend our understanding of perceptual decision making in three ways. First, we measured neuronal activity simultaneously in early [primary visual cortex (V1)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(131 reference statements)
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we can weakly predict false alarms from visual cortical activity (Fig. 6f,~52%, significantly greater than the chance level of 50%, p < 0.05 for both monkeys, one sample t-test) is consistent with previous work that reported choice probabilities (~55%) for neurons in MT, V1, V2, and V4 [72,22,41]. However, the observed decoding accuracies are not directly comparable to previously-reported choice probabilities because most previous work computes choice probabilities for a single neuron (here, we use a population of neurons), considers neural activity taken over large time windows (e.g., 1 second compared to 175 ms used here), and uses two-alternative forced choice tasks rather than our sequential task that required long periods of fixation.…”
Section: Models Of Perceptual Decision-makingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The fact that we can weakly predict false alarms from visual cortical activity (Fig. 6f,~52%, significantly greater than the chance level of 50%, p < 0.05 for both monkeys, one sample t-test) is consistent with previous work that reported choice probabilities (~55%) for neurons in MT, V1, V2, and V4 [72,22,41]. However, the observed decoding accuracies are not directly comparable to previously-reported choice probabilities because most previous work computes choice probabilities for a single neuron (here, we use a population of neurons), considers neural activity taken over large time windows (e.g., 1 second compared to 175 ms used here), and uses two-alternative forced choice tasks rather than our sequential task that required long periods of fixation.…”
Section: Models Of Perceptual Decision-makingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This mismatch might arise from shorter stimulus presentation, not tailoring the stimuli to match the neuron's tuning (as done in Britten et al (1992)), recording from lower-level visual areas (V1 vs. V4 or MT) with smaller receptive fields, as well as increased recording noise with calcium imaging as compared to electrophysiological recordings. These lower discrimination thresholds predict increasingly small choice correlations, in line with recent reports from area V1 of monkeys, where fewer than 7% of V1 neurons were found to feature significant choice correlations (Jasper, Tanabe, & Kohn, 2019). In general, the estimated asymptotic information predicted direction discrimination thresholds compatible with previous behavioral reports in mice (Abdolrahmani et al, 2019;Glickfeld et al, 2013), but the use of different stimuli in these experiments precludes a direct quantitative comparison.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our work instead indicates that the shape of the CP(p CR ) patterns cannot be summarized in the average, and this shape may be more informative about the role of the activity-choice covariations, when comparing across cells with different tuning properties, cells from different areas, or across task variations (e.g. Romo and Salinas, 2003;Nienborg and Cumming, 2006;Nienborg et al, 2012;Krug et al, 2016;Sanayei et al, 2018;Shushruth et al, 2018;Jasper et al, 2019;Steinmetz et al, 2019). Our new methods allow individuating and quantifying these CP patterns and hence a better characterization of the covariations between neural activity and choice across neural populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%