“…The internal/external technologies connected to the firm describe the technological context; the descriptive attributes of the firm describe the organizational context and environmental characteristics include the industry, competitors, suppliers and government (Jain, Le, Lin, & Cheng, 2011). Our research examines the influence of complexity, compatibility, and trialability in technological context (Doolin & Al Haj Ali, 2008;Lin & Lin, 2008;Mirchandani & Motwani, 2001;Premkumar & Roberts, 1999;Ramdani, Kawalek, & Lorenzo, 2009;Roberts & Pick, 2004;Srinivasan, Lilien, & Rangaswamy, 2002;Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2003); top management support, perceived financial cost and BIM expertise in organizational context (Al-Qirim, 2007;Balocco, Mogre, & Toletti, 2009;Doolin & Al Haj Ali, 2008;Grover, 1993;Huang, Janz, & Frolick, 2008;Kuan & Chau, 2001;Lin & Lin, 2008;Moore & Benbasat, 1991;Premkumar & Roberts, 1999;Zhu & Kraemer, 2005); and client requirements and trade partner readiness in environmental context (Al-Qirim, 2007;Doolin & Al Haj Ali, 2008;Lin & Lin, 2008;Premkumar & Roberts, 1999;Ramdani et al, 2009;Zhu et al, 2003) Adoption and Figure 2: TOE Framework (Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990) In the current research, TOE framework has been used for investigating the factors affecting BIM adoption among architectural firms in India. As BIM processes require organization wide adoption (including adoption in the project delivery network) and as this research focuses on studying the BIM adoption among architecture firms (and not individuals) an organizational-level adoption theory is deemed suitable for the current research.…”