Predicting the amputation risk for patients with diabetic foot ulceration – a Bayesian decision support tool

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major global health issue with a growing prevalence. In this context, the number of diabetic complications is also on the rise, such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which are closely linked to the risk of lower extremity amputation (LEA). Statistical prediction tools may support clinicians to initiate early tertiary LEA prevention for DFU patients. Thus, we designed Bayesian prediction models, as they produce transparent decision rules, quantify uncertainty intuitively and acknowledge prior available scientific knowledge. Method: A logistic regression using observational collected according to the standardised PEDIS classification was utilised to compute the six-month amputation risk of DFU patients for two types of LEA: 1.) any-amputation and 2.) major-amputation. Being able to incorporate information which is available before the analysis, the Bayesian models were fitted following a twofold strategy. First, the designed prediction models waive the available information and, second, we incorporated the a priori available scientific knowledge into our models. Then, we evaluated each model with respect to the effect of the predictors and validity of the models. Next, we compared the performance of both models with respect to the incorporation of prior knowledge. Results: This study included 237 patients. The mean age was 65.9 (SD 12.3), and 83.5% were male. Concerning the outcome, 31.6% underwent any-and 12.2% underwent a major-amputation procedure. The risk factors of perfusion, ulcer extent and depth revealed an impact on the outcomes, whereas the infection status and sensation did not. The major-amputation model using prior information outperformed the uninformed counterpart (AUC 0.765 vs AUC 0.790, Cohen's d 2.21). In contrast, the models predicting any-amputation performed similarly (0.793 vs 0.790, Cohen's d 0.22). Conclusions: Both of the Bayesian amputation risk models showed acceptable prognostic values, and the majoramputation model benefitted from incorporating a priori information from a previous study. Thus, PEDIS serves as a valid foundation for a clinical decision support tool for the prediction of the amputation risk in DFU patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated the use of the available prior scientific information within a Bayesian framework to establish chains of knowledge.

Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Risk of Hard-to-Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a Chinese Population

“…This procedure was replicated in a study conducted by Jens Hüsers et al . 41 Our research once again underscores the potential use of the NB model for low-dimensional categorization data from the medical field.…”

Classification Model for Diabetic Foot, Necrotizing Fasciitis, and Osteomyelitis

“…Bayesian manners yield transparency by offering the complete probability distributions for the estimated model parameters, statistical metrics, and predictions. Further, Bayesian models can easily incorporate previously available scientific information into new data [ 15 ]. Subsequently, the selection of plausible predictors (also termed features) was considered a crucial task based on previous studies.…”

“…As prolonged and worsening DFU infections result in at least limb amputation, the importance of early recognition cannot be overemphasized [ 15 ]. However, the chronic course of DFU and the indistinct signs of its infectious complications hinder differential diagnosis.…”

A prospective observational study of role of pedis scoring in predicting complications of diabetic foot in a tertiary centre

“…5 Diabetic foot ulcer is responsible for frequent hospital admissions and impairing quality of life. 6 In order to prevent further complications, the most accurate and globally accepted PEDIS scoring has come into play. This scoring system helps in assessing the wound, by considering its vascularity, infection, depth, extent and the sensation.…”