2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Trust and Distrust in Social Networks

Abstract: Abstract-As user-generated content and interactions have overtaken the web as the default mode of use, questions of whom and what to trust have become increasingly important. Fortunately, online social networks and social media have made it easy for users to indicate whom they trust and whom they do not. However, this does not solve the problem since each user is only likely to know a tiny fraction of other users; we must have methods for inferring trust -and distrust -between users who do not know one another… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation is that distrust is difficult to detect because it is a transient property in network relationships (Bian et al, 2009). There are also no accurate methods for measuring inferred distrust between social media users (DuBois, Golbeck & Srinivasan, 2011). Another potential explanation is that people use social media as a way to control information and relationships and thereby mitigate uncertainty (Tidwell & Walther, 2002) early on screening out any relationship that would have potential to breed distrust.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation is that distrust is difficult to detect because it is a transient property in network relationships (Bian et al, 2009). There are also no accurate methods for measuring inferred distrust between social media users (DuBois, Golbeck & Srinivasan, 2011). Another potential explanation is that people use social media as a way to control information and relationships and thereby mitigate uncertainty (Tidwell & Walther, 2002) early on screening out any relationship that would have potential to breed distrust.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, this method allows users to indicate how much they "trust" their friends' preferences in the recommendation domain. Several researchers have investigated this idea of assigning trust scores to friends in collaborative recommenders, through explicit mechanisms such as in Golbeck's FilmTrust system [14] which can support propagation of trust scores around a network of peers, and through automated mechanisms for modeling trust such as [10,36]. Several recent studies have extended these ideas to prediction of personality, and by derivation, behavior of a user within the system [1] in terms of both trust and distrust [15].…”
Section: Social Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative proposed by [17] applies a probablistic method to postulate the existence of a path between origin and sink with a seperate spring-embedding layout alogrithm. The latter provides a spatial dimension with directly connected nodes being attracted or repelled from each other based on their trust values.…”
Section: Indirect Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%