2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00709-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting tumour radiosensitivity to deliver precision radiotherapy

Abstract: Owing to advances in radiotherapy, the physical properties of radiation can be optimized to enable individualized treatment; however, optimization is rarely based on biological properties and, therefore, treatments are generally planned with the assumption that all tumours respond similarly to radiation. Radiation affects multiple cellular pathways, including DNA damage, hypoxia, proliferation, stem cell phenotype and immune response. In this Review, we summarize the effect of these pathways on tumour response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…109 Perhaps no other area of radiotherapy research is as intensely studied today as the role of immune infiltration and immune reactions, either as mechanisms to synergize response or to understand how to amplify tumor damage. 110 The assessment of ROS is highly relevant to the immune response 111 because it is thought to be a driving force in initiating immune infiltration as well as likely altering local responses. Thus the ability to use in vivo optical reporters has substantial value in improving radiobiological impacts of immune response and immunotherapy.…”
Section: Linkage To Biological Damage Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…109 Perhaps no other area of radiotherapy research is as intensely studied today as the role of immune infiltration and immune reactions, either as mechanisms to synergize response or to understand how to amplify tumor damage. 110 The assessment of ROS is highly relevant to the immune response 111 because it is thought to be a driving force in initiating immune infiltration as well as likely altering local responses. Thus the ability to use in vivo optical reporters has substantial value in improving radiobiological impacts of immune response and immunotherapy.…”
Section: Linkage To Biological Damage Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 ] Radiosensitizers can either directly interact with biomacromolecules through electrophilic reactions to cause tumor cell damage, or increase the effect of tumor radiotherapy by inhibiting the DNA repair process. [ 4 ] Nanomaterial‐mediated radiosensitizers have been widely explored for enhanced radiotherapeutic efficiency as their high atomic number (high‐ Z ) originated radiosensitive activities, catalytic ability in manipulating redox balance, and potential drug‐delivering capability. [ 5 ] Gold, as a representative high‐ Z elemental, has witnessed great progress in radiotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, even with the emergence of various anti-tumor treatments, single imaging techniques with monotherapy rarely achieve ideal outcomes due to the incomplete acquisition of cancer characteristics or suboptimal cancer ablation. [3][4][5][6][7] As a conventional cancer treatment strategy, [8][9][10] radiotherapy targets cells using ionizing radiation, which is extensively used to treat about 70% of patients in clinical cancer therapy. 11 Nevertheless, considering the hazard of ionizing radiation to healthy organs, the dose of ionizing radiation is limited to an acceptable range, which results in insufficient antitumor efficacy especially for hypoxic cells, [12][13][14] due to the lack of sufficient oxygen which can prevent DNA repair in irradiated cancer cells through stabilizing radiation-induced DNA damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%