2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Visual Outcome After Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas With Optical Coherence Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
3
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
94
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…OCT in several small studies has been useful in predicting visual outcome following the treatment of pituitary adenomas [91,92]. In a study of 19 patients, a greater RNFL thickness prior to treatment increased the probability of visual recovery following treatment (17 surgical and 2 pharmacological treatments).…”
Section: Compressive and Infiltrative Optic Neuropathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCT in several small studies has been useful in predicting visual outcome following the treatment of pituitary adenomas [91,92]. In a study of 19 patients, a greater RNFL thickness prior to treatment increased the probability of visual recovery following treatment (17 surgical and 2 pharmacological treatments).…”
Section: Compressive and Infiltrative Optic Neuropathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Using the same technique, Johansson and Lindblom noted a reduction of cpRNFL that did not correlate with the visual field defect. 15 In 19 patients, Jacob et al 16 demonstrated that cpRNFL thinning measured by stratus OCT decreased the patient's chances of recovery of initial visual field defect 3 months after treatment. Inferior cpRNFL was strongly prognostic of visual field outcome after treatment of anterior visual pathway compressive lesions.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCC includes the RNFL, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layers, and inner plexiform layer. 13 Previous studies [14][15][16][17][18] of patients with large pituitary tumours that induce optic chiasm compression identified a diffuse loss of RNFLs, even in the absence of visual field defects, and hypothesised that pituitary tumours per se, even in the absence of a compressive effect on the chiasm, may cause reversible RGC dysfunction. Whether pituitary tumours not associated to optic chiasm compression may also induce damage in RNFL is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thinner the RNFL in a patient with an intracranial lesion that compresses the optic nerve, the more atrophy has occurred and the less likely it is for visual recovery to occur after optic nerve decompression. The prognostic value of OCT in patients with lesions compressing the optic nerve has been assessed by two different groups, both of which have concluded that this noninvasive imaging technique can be used as a prognostic tool in such patients [4,5]. Indeed, the study by Jacob et al [5] concluded that in patients with pituitary adenomas compressing the anterior visual pathways, the odds of complete recovery after 3 months from the initial visual field defect was multiplied by 1.29 for each increase by 1 µm of mean RNFL, independent from age and duration of symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic value of OCT in patients with lesions compressing the optic nerve has been assessed by two different groups, both of which have concluded that this noninvasive imaging technique can be used as a prognostic tool in such patients [4,5]. Indeed, the study by Jacob et al [5] concluded that in patients with pituitary adenomas compressing the anterior visual pathways, the odds of complete recovery after 3 months from the initial visual field defect was multiplied by 1.29 for each increase by 1 µm of mean RNFL, independent from age and duration of symptoms. I commend the authors for emphasizing that even patients with chronically poor visual function from compressive optic neuropathy can recover after decompression and suggest that RNFL thickness as measured by OCT is a better prognostic indicator of potential visual recovery in such patients than the time-honored factors of preoperative visual status and duration of visual symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%