2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40996-018-0161-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Compaction Characteristics of Soils from Index Test’s Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Omar et al [6], among the three parameters (specific gravity, fine content, and liquid limit) that have been used in the correlation, the specific gravity has a greater influence on MDD. The significant effect of the specific gravity was confirmed in the study carried out by Di Matteo et al [5], Karimpour-Fard et al [4], and Bera and Ghosh [3] using 4, 4, and 5 soil parameters, respectively, on the MDD predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Omar et al [6], among the three parameters (specific gravity, fine content, and liquid limit) that have been used in the correlation, the specific gravity has a greater influence on MDD. The significant effect of the specific gravity was confirmed in the study carried out by Di Matteo et al [5], Karimpour-Fard et al [4], and Bera and Ghosh [3] using 4, 4, and 5 soil parameters, respectively, on the MDD predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Several studies have correlated MDD with numerous index soil properties and compaction parameters. For example, the MDD was correlated to: (1) A combination of six parameters in Gunaydın [2] using liquid limit, plastic limit, specific gravity, fine content, gravel content, and sand content; (2) A group of five parameters in Bera and Ghosh [3] using compaction energy, specific gravity, liquid limit, plastic limit, and grain size; (3) A combination of four parameters in Karimpour-Fard et al [4] using optimum moisture content, saturation degree, specific gravity, and unit weight of water also in Di Matteo et al [5] using optimum moisture content, plastic limit, liquid limit, and specific gravity; (4) A group of three parameters in Omar et al [6] using specific gravity, fine content, and liquid limit, Farooq et al [7] using liquid limit, plasticity index, and compaction effort;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean and standard deviation for MoPesm and laboratory tests were similar. MoPesm predictions had a MAPE of 2,57%, a RMSE of 0,585, a R of 0,873, and a R 2 of 0,763, a very acceptable performance according to Wang and Yin (2020), to whom a high R 2 and low MAPE and RMSE indicate that a model has a higher precision, and to Karimpour-Fard et al (2019), who considered a R 2 above 0,70 as acceptable, labeling such model as "strong".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The compaction parameters -optimum moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry unit weight (γ d, max ) -are determined through very time-consuming laboratory tests. This makes prediction models that are based on easily measurable soil properties (such as those described above) highly desirable and remarkably useful (Karimpour-Fard et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation