2020
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202005.0431.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Postoperative Outcomes Following Hip Fracture Surgery: Independent Validation and Recalibration of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score

Abstract: Objectives: Independent validation of risk scores after hip fracture is uncommon, particularly for evaluation of outcomes other than death. We aimed to assess the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) for prediction of mortality, physical function, length of stay and postoperative complications. Design: Analysis of routinely collected prospective data. Setting and Participants: Consecutive hip fracture patients were identified from the Northumbria hip fracture database between 2014-2018. Patients were e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Lastly, a study by Doherty et al was published recently describing the predictive value of the NHFS for mortality, physical function, length of stay, and postoperative complications. 21 Compared to our multicenter study design with an inclusion period of 3 years, this singlecenter study had an inclusion period of about 10 years, limiting its generalizability. Also, its results would be subject to changes in care over the period in which enrolment of the patients was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…20 Lastly, a study by Doherty et al was published recently describing the predictive value of the NHFS for mortality, physical function, length of stay, and postoperative complications. 21 Compared to our multicenter study design with an inclusion period of 3 years, this singlecenter study had an inclusion period of about 10 years, limiting its generalizability. Also, its results would be subject to changes in care over the period in which enrolment of the patients was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8,21 It has undergone external validation in several studies, although recalibration has been required to accommodate for geographical differences. 22,23 The NHFS uses 7 variables to calculate the risk of mortality after hip fracture surgery: age, gender, serum hemoglobin, number of comorbidities, institutionalization, malignancy, and the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). The recalibrated NHFS uses the formula 100/{1 + e [5.012 • (NHFS • 0.481)] } to predict 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery.…”
Section: Nhfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical prediction models have been proposed to predict medium- and long-term functional outcomes, such as ADL function and walking ability, based on preoperative and postoperative characteristics of patients with hip fractures. The preoperative factors include age [7,8], nursing care level [7], fracture type [7], cognitive status [9,10], walking ability [8,10–13], residence [10], comorbidities [8,9,14], and nutritional status [10,15]. The only postoperative functional outcome predictor included in previous clinical prediction models is the ADL function measured using the Barthel Index (BI) score at 2 weeks after surgery [7,10,11], which is the most important predictor for medium- to long-term functional outcomes [7,10,11] among all proposed preoperative and postoperative predictors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%