2020
DOI: 10.1002/app.48999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of electrical percolation of graphene‐based nanocomposites by the three‐dimensional Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract: Disk model is usually used to represent graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) which are considered as frame‐like structure with edges and corners, and it has lack of quantitative accuracy. In order to minimize error caused by morphology, distribution, and interaction between GNPs and matrix, square and folded plate models were constructed to predict the percolation volume fraction (ϕc) of GNPs‐based nanocomposites by calculating connection possibility. Meanwhile, disk model is used for comparison. The results revealed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher φ gc,sim than φ gc can be related to the numerous simplifying assumptions implemented in the current simulation, such as ignoring the flexibility of graphenes or the length distribution of MWCNTs. 67,68 However, the acquired results for φ gc,sim of the composites of monofiller and physically mixed fillers are comparable with other simulation studies. 66 It must be emphasized that since MWCNTs and graphenes in all model systems are uniformly dispersed, the lower φ gc,sim of HG than G is a purely geometrical effect.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The higher φ gc,sim than φ gc can be related to the numerous simplifying assumptions implemented in the current simulation, such as ignoring the flexibility of graphenes or the length distribution of MWCNTs. 67,68 However, the acquired results for φ gc,sim of the composites of monofiller and physically mixed fillers are comparable with other simulation studies. 66 It must be emphasized that since MWCNTs and graphenes in all model systems are uniformly dispersed, the lower φ gc,sim of HG than G is a purely geometrical effect.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“… ( a ) Schematic diagrams of the disk model, square model, and folded plate model of graphene; ( b ) model predictions and experimental percolation threshold results [ 111 ]; ( c – f ) effective conductivity versus volume fraction for different parameters; ( c ) tunneling distance dc; ( d ) interface thickness; ( e ) polymer barrier; ( f ) graphene thickness [ 113 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rectangular plate and the folded plate Presently, most of the conductive material models in the research are generated by the "rand" function, but there exists the problem of the uneven probability distribution of the model orientation, which affects the position and normal vector of the conductive material model. Liu et al [111] proposed the "uniform_real_distribution" function in C++ to generate the decimals uniformly distributed between 0 and 1, thus obtaining uniform polar and azimuthal angles for the graphene model. Thus, uniform polar and azimuthal angles are obtained for the graphene model, and the 3D Monte Carlo model of the graphene filled polymer is constructed on the basis of this function.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Models Of Graphene-filled Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%