2011
DOI: 10.1002/qj.715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive skill of a subset of models participating in D‐PHASE in the COPS region

Abstract: The unique combination of observing and modelling efforts during the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study (COPS) and D-PHASE (Demonstration of the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale was chosen in order to simulate feedback processes between areas with different land-surface properties, atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), convection initiation, clouds and precipitation as realistically as possible. Recent results of convection-permitting simulations confirm their superior performance compared to models with convection parameterization with respect to the resolution of landsurface heterogeneity and orography (Schwitalla et al, 2008;Wulfmeyer et al, 2008Wulfmeyer et al, , 2011Rotach et al, 2009a, b) and to enhanced forecast skills Bauer et al, 2011). Convection-permitting resolution is essential in this study, particularly considering the relatively small spatial domain of the Jatropha curcas plantation.…”
Section: Model Set Upsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This scale was chosen in order to simulate feedback processes between areas with different land-surface properties, atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), convection initiation, clouds and precipitation as realistically as possible. Recent results of convection-permitting simulations confirm their superior performance compared to models with convection parameterization with respect to the resolution of landsurface heterogeneity and orography (Schwitalla et al, 2008;Wulfmeyer et al, 2008Wulfmeyer et al, , 2011Rotach et al, 2009a, b) and to enhanced forecast skills Bauer et al, 2011). Convection-permitting resolution is essential in this study, particularly considering the relatively small spatial domain of the Jatropha curcas plantation.…”
Section: Model Set Upsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In general, the AROME model was found to overpredict the precipitation, as indicated by bias values of the order of 1.1. This point has already been stressed by Bauer et al (2011a), who analyzed the results of the COPS real-time forecasts. Assimilation of the lidar observations did not correct the overestimation.…”
Section: Whole Periodmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since the forecast is too far from reality, the assimilation does not help to improve the forecast. Secondly, July 2007 was abnormally moist and during the forecast period the COPS area was crossed by a sequence of frontal and mesoscale convective system passages (Bauer et al, 2011a). As a result, the daily precipitation cycle did not show the usual summertime mid-afternoon peak but instead an early night maximum, not especially connected with the diurnal heating forcing but rather with the timing of the synoptic perturbations.…”
Section: Whole Periodmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With respect to the timing of the maxima, AROME-EPS shows a time shift of −3 h, with ALADIN-LAEF showing a time shift of −6 h for weak synoptic forcing in regions Austria and West (panels b and d), respectively. Because of the limited framework of this study we can only speculate that this behavior might be due to differences caused by the deep convection scheme in ALADIN-LAEF, which is one of the reasons that causes an early onset of precipitation (Bechtold et al, 2013) and, respectively, the explicit simulation of deep convection in AROME. Another reason, which we cannot exclude, could be that ALADIN-LAEF and AROME apply different physical parameterizations.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Precipitation Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus will be on the capabilities of the CP ensemble to quantitatively predict precipitation during a convective summer period over an area consisting of mountains and lowlands. Of interest here is the Alpine region, since the impacts of the mountainous terrain, such as windward/lee effects, the differential heating of valley, and mountain slopes can cause large inaccuracies in forecasting convective precipitation and pose a challenge for numerical models and their physical parameterizations (Richard et al, 2007;Wulfmeyer et al, 2008Wulfmeyer et al, , 2011Bauer et al, 2011). Therefore, an evaluation study is designed and conducted for a typical convective season (3 months, MayAugust 2011), i.e., a period, which is long enough to make at least basic statements about the significance of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%