2017
DOI: 10.1177/0022487117702577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Validity and Impact of CAEP Standard 3.2: Results From One Master’s-Level Teacher Preparation Program

Abstract: This study investigates the predictive validity and policy impact of Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation minimum admission requirements in Standard 3.2 on teacher preparation programs (TPPs), their applicants, and the broader field of educator preparation. Undergraduate grade point average (GPA) and Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores from 533 program graduates in one master’s-level TPP were examined for their ability to predict graduate GPA and the effect minimum admissions criteria had on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate assessment about admission criteria is important to both student and faculty alike. Overall, it appears that quality of academic materials and the rigor of course syllabi are of little to no concern in admission decisions for graduate students, and trends for materials that are most critical to an admissions committee are largely the same (Evans, 2017;Forrest & Naremore, 1998;Galang et al, 2011;Keith-Spiegel et al, 1994; Kuncel et al, 2014;Lizares et al, 2016;Weiner, 2017). Students who have inaccurate view on admission criteria may be at a disadvantage if they fail to acquire desired experiences valued by graduate programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accurate assessment about admission criteria is important to both student and faculty alike. Overall, it appears that quality of academic materials and the rigor of course syllabi are of little to no concern in admission decisions for graduate students, and trends for materials that are most critical to an admissions committee are largely the same (Evans, 2017;Forrest & Naremore, 1998;Galang et al, 2011;Keith-Spiegel et al, 1994; Kuncel et al, 2014;Lizares et al, 2016;Weiner, 2017). Students who have inaccurate view on admission criteria may be at a disadvantage if they fail to acquire desired experiences valued by graduate programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables that were most common between the studies were chosen for this section of the survey. For example, many studies indicated variables that demonstrate a student has skills that signify an ability to succeed, which can be evidenced by GPA, for academic performance; standardized test scores, for qualitative skills, quantitative skills, and communication and subject specific skills; and letters of recommendation, to further support strengths in areas assessed by standardized test scores and other relevant information (Evans, 2017;Forrest & Naremore, 1998;Galang et al, 2011;Keith-Spiegel et al, 1994;Kuncel et al, 2014;Lizares et al, 2016;Weiner, 2017). Those three variables were reported to be the most commonly requested student data that assists decision makers in understanding a prospective student's skills, interests, and experience in and exposure to the field.…”
Section: Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El incremento de requisitos académicos de ingreso en formación docente ha demostrado además afectar negativamente la selección de estudiantes de grupos marginalizados y de postulantes hombres (Van Overschelde & López, 2019). Existen también preocupaciones sobre el impacto negativo de esta medida en la sustentabilidad de las carreras de pedagogía y en la capacidad de formar docentes en coherencia con la demanda del sistema escolar (Evans, 2017).…”
Section: Aumento De Requisitos De Ingresounclassified
“…The pragmatic literature suggesting specific approaches to validity and reliability evidence is almost nonexistent, lacking the “how to” details needed in any academic discipline. A search in the ERIC database on the keywords “CAEP” and “validity” in the title yielded only two articles, one a readiness survey (Kelly, ) and the other a predictive validity study of GRE (Evans, ). A second search for “accreditation” and “validity” in the title, without reference to teacher education, yielded only three journal articles, all in the health professions and environmental education (Can, ; Kassebaum, Cutler, & Eaglen ; Macpherson, ).…”
Section: Problem Statement and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%