2017
DOI: 10.1177/1073191117731814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of Traditional Measures of Executive Function on Broad Abilities of the Cattell–Horn–Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities

Abstract: The neuropsychological construct of executive functions (EFs), and the psychometric Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities are both approaches that attempt to describe cognitive functioning. The coherence between EF and CHC abilities has been mainly studied using factor-analytical techniques. Through multivariate regression analysis, the current study now assesses the integration of these latent constructs in clinical assessment. The predictive power of six widely used executive tasks on five… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors have tried to unify intelligence and neuropsychological assessment based on the CHC model [58,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. For example, Jewsbury et al [65] showed that popular neuropsychological EF tests were subsumable under CHC broad cognitive abilities based on factor analytic methods, although particular EF tests were related to distinct CHC constructs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of authors have tried to unify intelligence and neuropsychological assessment based on the CHC model [58,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. For example, Jewsbury et al [65] showed that popular neuropsychological EF tests were subsumable under CHC broad cognitive abilities based on factor analytic methods, although particular EF tests were related to distinct CHC constructs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the few exceptions to that rule were discussed above in detail. These studies had their methodological grounding in factor analytic methods [64,65,[68][69][70], in regression methods [71], or in neuropsychological patient studies [15,72].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to describing cognitive function, based on neuropsychological theory, emphasizes the role of executive function (a higher-order process that controls and regulates basic cognitive functions). Whereas CHC theory is typically applied to the study of cognitive abilities in large nonpathological samples, executive function theory is mostly studied in clinical settings ( 2 ). The current study adopted the former CHC approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jewsbury et al (2016) argued that EFs and facets of intelligence represent different facets of general cognition. In practice, this implies that assessing one of the two constructs does not make assessing the other redundant, although the performance on one may predict the performance on the other to some extent (van Aken et al, 2019). Thus, reducing the testing burden for young test-takers by focusing on only one construct may come at the cost of insufficient construct coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%