1971
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-197106000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of academic performance in gross anatomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the consequences of replacing dissection of lower limb by work on prosected specimens and within a much reduced time framework have been studied by Sinclair (1965), and more recently the same author (Sinclair, 1972) has assessed the effect of a reduced time allocation on the recall of anatomical data. Perhaps surprisingly, in view of the frequent necessity to curtail courses and consequently to define ‘relevance’ and ‘core’, there has been little reference to the use of objectives (Moffat, Jacobs, and Metcalf, 1971) or to the definition of objectives in terms of ordered behavioural outcomes (Gronlund, 1970). Though the techniques of small group discussion have previously been used within an anatomy department (Abercrombie, 1969; Johnson, 1950) for their broad educational value, they were only peripherally applied to teaching programmes in the subject.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the consequences of replacing dissection of lower limb by work on prosected specimens and within a much reduced time framework have been studied by Sinclair (1965), and more recently the same author (Sinclair, 1972) has assessed the effect of a reduced time allocation on the recall of anatomical data. Perhaps surprisingly, in view of the frequent necessity to curtail courses and consequently to define ‘relevance’ and ‘core’, there has been little reference to the use of objectives (Moffat, Jacobs, and Metcalf, 1971) or to the definition of objectives in terms of ordered behavioural outcomes (Gronlund, 1970). Though the techniques of small group discussion have previously been used within an anatomy department (Abercrombie, 1969; Johnson, 1950) for their broad educational value, they were only peripherally applied to teaching programmes in the subject.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%