1969
DOI: 10.1093/jee/62.1.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference of Green Peach Aphids for Virus-Infected Sugar beet Leaves12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferences and increased feeding or reproduction by cucumber beetles and melon aphids did not translate to in¯uences on insect densities on whole C. cucumerinuminfected plants in the ®eld, in contrast to preferences by striped cucumber beetles for whole caged cucumber seedlings infected with a necrosis-causing virus (Apriyanto and Potter 1990) and increased alate aphid movement to virus-infected sugarbeets (Macias and Mink 1969). The signi®cant dependence of cross-eects on leaf position and in some cases time may have contributed to the lack of ®eld eects, since in the ®eld experiment plants were not examined with the same degree of spatial resolution as greenhouse studies, and were not sampled until 2 weeks after inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Preferences and increased feeding or reproduction by cucumber beetles and melon aphids did not translate to in¯uences on insect densities on whole C. cucumerinuminfected plants in the ®eld, in contrast to preferences by striped cucumber beetles for whole caged cucumber seedlings infected with a necrosis-causing virus (Apriyanto and Potter 1990) and increased alate aphid movement to virus-infected sugarbeets (Macias and Mink 1969). The signi®cant dependence of cross-eects on leaf position and in some cases time may have contributed to the lack of ®eld eects, since in the ®eld experiment plants were not examined with the same degree of spatial resolution as greenhouse studies, and were not sampled until 2 weeks after inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The preferential acquisition of CaMV by infected plants might be because these plants are more attractive to vectors. For example, Macias & Mink (1969) found that in detached-leaf experiments with sugar beet, M. persicae preferred leaves infected with BWYV or sugar beet yellows. This might also explain the observations of Walsh & Tomlinson (1985) who surveyed oilseed rape in Warwickshire (UK) and found that all plants infected with BWYV or broccoli necrotic yellows cytorhabdovirus (BNYV) were also infected with CaMV.…”
Section: Associations Among Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insect vectors feeding on infected plants have been reported to differ in growth rates, longevity and fecundity, as compared with those on uninfected plants (Kennedy 1951;Baker 1960;Hodgson 1981;Costa et al 1991;Fereres et al 1999). Some insect vectors preferentially colonize infected plants that are superior hosts to uninfected plants (Macias & Mink 1969;Ajayi & Dewar 1983;Eckel & Lampert 1996;Castle et al 1998) or avoid infected plants that are inferior hosts (Blua & Perring 1992). Vector responses to virusinfected plants may be advantageous for the virus by promoting its spread (Blua & Perring 1992;McElhany et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%