“…Various QAMs have been described in the literature, including 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate derivatives with chloride [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], bromide [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], and iodide [ 16 , 17 ] counter ions, quaternary ammonium derivative of bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate [ 18 ], and fully aliphatic [ 19 ] and cycloaliphatic [ 20 , 21 ] urethane-dimethacrylates. Such QAMs represent potential antibacterial components of dental composites because they offer high antibacterial activity against various strains, including Streptococcus mutans [ 4 , 5 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 20 , 21 ], Staphylococcus aureus [ 5 , 18 ], and Escherichia coli [ 18 ]. However, the well-known QAMs induce a loss of mechanical properties and an increase in the amount of water absorbed by the material and in residual fraction release [ 4 , 5 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 ].…”