2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of polypropylene (PP) composite foams with high impact strengths by supercritical carbon dioxide and their feasible evaluation for electronic packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past years, many researchers have attempted to use scCO 2 as a physical blowing agent for preparing polypropylene (PP) foam owing to its high thermal stability and mechanical properties . Although PP foam is a versatile material, its low melt strength and narrow foaming temperature window restrict the continuous fabrication of PP foams in industrial scale .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, many researchers have attempted to use scCO 2 as a physical blowing agent for preparing polypropylene (PP) foam owing to its high thermal stability and mechanical properties . Although PP foam is a versatile material, its low melt strength and narrow foaming temperature window restrict the continuous fabrication of PP foams in industrial scale .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water absorption decreases as the content of the bicycloalkyl group increases. The lowest water absorption occurs for a copolymerization ratio of 10% [22,23,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Promisingly, microcellular foamed iPP has a wide range of potential applications, due to its advantages such as higher deforming temperature, light weight, excellent thermal and sound insulation properties, improved impact strength, as well as cost and energy saving merits, over the other traditional physical or chemical fabricated polymer foams. 4,712 However, the weak melt strength of iPP during extrusion or injection foaming processes hinders it to gain high foam quality, accompanying with gas escaping and cell collapse defects, during degassing at a foaming temperature much higher to its nominal melting point. 2,4,11,1316 Moreover, when iPP is subjected to a batch foaming procedure at relatively lower saturation or foaming temperatures (i.e., much more below to iPP’s nominal melting point), it could not be expanded easily, because of its high crystallinity and rigidity of the matrix, 2,11,17 meanwhile, physical foaming agent such as supercritical CO 2 or N 2 could not be dissolved into the crystallized region, compared to the amorphous domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%