2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00255-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure effect on soot formation in turbulent diffusion flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated soot volume fraction at the two last locations in the flame is under-predicted, which is possibly a consequence of inaccurate temperature predictions. This contrasts to the flamelet predictions of Roditcheva and Bai [51] which accurately simulate the radial temperature profile at all axial locations, but imprecisely compute the radial soot yields.…”
Section: Methane-air Elevated Pressure Flamescontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated soot volume fraction at the two last locations in the flame is under-predicted, which is possibly a consequence of inaccurate temperature predictions. This contrasts to the flamelet predictions of Roditcheva and Bai [51] which accurately simulate the radial temperature profile at all axial locations, but imprecisely compute the radial soot yields.…”
Section: Methane-air Elevated Pressure Flamescontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Although it is believed that both physical and chemical effects play important roles in soot formation at high pressure, a number of numerical simulation studies show that the influence of pressure is primarily a physical phenomenon rather than a chemical one. Roditcheva and Bai [51] argued that in addition to the increase of density and soot precursor species concentrations, which result in an increase of soot surface growth rate, the increase of residence time also contributes by giving allowance to the relatively slow soot chemistry. However, Liu et al [53] confirmed from their simulations that soot particles experience almost the same residence times at different pressures.…”
Section: Methane-air Elevated Pressure Flamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5), 1 m 2 for laminar rich premixed C 2 H 4 =air flames and various laminar and turbulent diffusion flames (Fischer & Moss, 1998) and m ¼ 3 for laminar CH 4 =air non-premixed flame at pressures lower than 30 bar (Roditcheva & Bai, 2001). The opposite reported dependence of soot formation on pressure may be caused by two factors.…”
Section: Ultra Rich Premixed Combustion Of Natural Gas 445mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the heat release rates are higher at a low pressure, the radiation fractions become even lower in Lhasa, especially for the acetylene fi res. Higher radiation fl ux and radiation fraction in Hefei are due to the increased soot formation at a higher pressure (Intasopa, 2011;Roditcheva and Bai, 2001). …”
Section: Radiation Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%