“…Both potential are proven in terms of reasonable thermodynamics for ice, e.g., with accurate melting points of ∼270 K. , Naturally, TIP4P-Ice is expected to be more accurate (at the very least kinetically), , due to explicit long-range dipolar and Coulombic electrostatic interactions, particularly at solid–liquid interfaces . Indeed, one interesting matter concerns a detailed comparison of mW versus TIP4P-Ice in terms of sudden pressurization-response behavior, as regards characterization of (probably metastable intermediates’) structural, energetic and dynamical properties, as well as their likelihood of reversibility within nanoseconds to ice I h , given that refs , found that for both pressure-amorphised ice and methane hydrate, removal of pressure led to recovery of a defective, near-crystalline state, i.e., the transformations were near-reversible. We performed MD for ∼70–130 ns at 240 K (owing to be a near-optimal temperature for potential interesting propagation of ice-stacking faults, if present), under pressures of up 30 kbar, on systems ranging in size from ∼40,000 to 1 million molecules for TIP4P-Ice and at the latter size for mW (given greater computational speed).…”