1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(99)00046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalidation of the Embryonic Stem Cell Test (EST)—A New In Vitro Embryotoxicity Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
95
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An algorithm eventually integrates these three values to obtain an evaluation of predicted embryotoxicity. As required by the EST standardized protocol, 20,21 due to the higher sensitivity of mES to toxic agents, as compared to NIH3T3 differentiated cells, different concentrations of the tested compound are to be used for the two cell lines in order to obtain …”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An algorithm eventually integrates these three values to obtain an evaluation of predicted embryotoxicity. As required by the EST standardized protocol, 20,21 due to the higher sensitivity of mES to toxic agents, as compared to NIH3T3 differentiated cells, different concentrations of the tested compound are to be used for the two cell lines in order to obtain …”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, we have evaluated whether an in vitro test, the embryonic stem cell test 20,21 might provide reliable predictive information on SWCNTs' embryotoxicity. The EST is an in vitro test validated by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) that allows reliably classifying chemical compounds as strong, weak, or nonembryotoxic, without using animal experimentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2: Contingency table comparing in vive and in vitro classifications tended to be most affeeted when nonembryotoxie substanees were tested (Scholz et al, 1999a;Gensehow et al, 2002). A balaneed eombination of the end points of the eytotoxieity test with undifferentiated and differentiated cells and the differentiation assay is known to give the most accurate results (Scholz et al, 1999b). In eomparison to the ECVAM experiments, our results (aeeuraey of 81%) are a slight improvement on the predietion model used in the ECVAM study, whieh resulted in an aeeuraey of 78% (also classified as being "good") (Gensehow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The EST, along with the whole embryo culture assay and the limb bud micromass assay, have been validated in an extensive study sponsored by ECVAM, the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (Scholz et al, 1999b;Genschow et al, 2000Genschow et al, , 2002Genschow et al, and 2004. The EST assays resulted in an initial set of 6 chemieals being 93% correctly elassified, and 78% of the 14 chemie als were correctly elassified in the formal validation study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test models in vitro include those of whole embryo culture, ES cell micro mass cultivation, testicular cells, ovarian cells, and the EST [11]. With the advantage that only permanent cell lines are used, and consequently, no pregnant animals need be sacrificed to obtain embryonic cells, tissues or organs, EST validated by ECVAM was one of the most widely models to predict developmental toxicity [12]. ECVAM validation research has shown that prediction accuracy of EST for non-and weak embryotoxic compounds is 78%, and is 100% for strong embryotoxicants [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%