1990
DOI: 10.1016/0079-6611(90)90007-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary production, plant and detrital biomass, and particle transport in the Columbia River Estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our investigations also support the hypotheses that 1) reduced input of macrodetritus from wetland habitat loss in the estuary has undermined salmonid food webs, and 2) such losses are not compensated by enhanced delivery of phytoplankton and microdetritus to the estuary from upriver reservoirs (Sherwood et al 1990;Small et al 1990;Bottom et al 2005). Juvenile salmon throughout the estuary fed on insect prey produced in wetlands and other shallow habitats, and energy flow to salmon was linked to wetland detritus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our investigations also support the hypotheses that 1) reduced input of macrodetritus from wetland habitat loss in the estuary has undermined salmonid food webs, and 2) such losses are not compensated by enhanced delivery of phytoplankton and microdetritus to the estuary from upriver reservoirs (Sherwood et al 1990;Small et al 1990;Bottom et al 2005). Juvenile salmon throughout the estuary fed on insect prey produced in wetlands and other shallow habitats, and energy flow to salmon was linked to wetland detritus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…At the same time, enhanced phytoplankton production, which occurs in the reservoirs behind mainstem dams, increased the amount of microdetritus delivered from upriver sources by approximately 31,000 t C year -1 (Sherwood et al 1990). Fluvial phytoplankton now accounts for approximately 58% of the carbon available in the estuary compared with only 37% available from vascular plants (Small et al 1990). …”
Section: Estuarine Food Websmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of tides in macrotidal estuaries increases the residence times of both water and suspended matter. This forms MTZs, where photosynthesis is strongly limited by light availability (Cole et al 1992;Fishez et al 1992;Irigoien and Castel 1997) and where allochthonous materials originating from soil erosion and river-borne phytoplankton detritus are predominant (Relexans et al 1988;Small et al 1990;Bianchi et al 1993). Heterotrophic activity, enhanced by high turbidity (Crump et al 1998), results in a net mineralization of a major part of the particulate organic carbon (POC) (Wollast 1983;Smith and Hollibaugh 1993;Keil et al 1996;Gattuso et al 1998), producing CO 2 that interacts with the carbonate system (Kempe and E. Lemaire (DGO) for analytical help.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike streams in nontidal upland regions, semidiurnal and spring-neap variation in water level in the CRE imposes a structuring force on both geophysical features and biota, especially as distance to the mouth of the river decreases. Water elevation fluctuations, keyed to site topography, directly determine periods of inundation and salinity intrusion (Kukulka and Jay 2003a, b) and this in turn structures plant communities and fish habitat use (Thomas 1983;Fox et al 1984;Small et al 1990). The tidal cycle controls the magnitude and duration of bidirectional current velocities that cause sedimentation/erosion and the evolution of geomorphological features like tidal channels and levees (Hume and Bell 1993).…”
Section: Core Monitored Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%