2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary-Tier Interventions and Supports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 University of South Florida, Tampa, USA 2 University of Florida, Gainesville, USA systems that support evidence-based practices (George, Kincaid, & Pollard-Sage, 2009;www.pbis.org).…”
Section: Research-article2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 University of South Florida, Tampa, USA 2 University of Florida, Gainesville, USA systems that support evidence-based practices (George, Kincaid, & Pollard-Sage, 2009;www.pbis.org).…”
Section: Research-article2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the primary level of prevention in SWPBS, support is provided for all students in all settings. These include teaching a set of appropriate behaviors, reinforcing appropriate behaviors, and having clearly deÞned and predictable consequences for problem behaviors (George, Kincaid, & Pollard-Sage, 2009). At the secondary level, efÞcient and effective interventions are provided for at-risk students who do not respond to primary prevention support (Hawken, Adolphson, MacLeod, & Schumann, 2009).…”
Section: Origins and Conceptual Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, systems coaching involves collaborating with school and district leaders to facilitate an educational environment that improves student outcomes. Systems coaches focus on issues such as establishing rules, routines, and procedures that promote implementation; organizing resources to support implementation; using data to evaluate fidelity and related outcomes; facilitating data-based planning and problem solving, and providing training and technical assistance (Brown et al, 2005;Forman & Crystal, 2015;George, Kincaid, & Pollard-Sage, 2009;Killion & Harrison, 2006;March & Gaunt, 2013;Neufeld & Roper, 2003;Sims, March, Barrett, & Knotek, 2015). In addition, systems coaches must be responsive to the culture, context, and climate at their sites and to the specific initiative they are supporting necessitating that their responsibilities differ across sites (Kowal & Steiner, 2007;Sims et al, 2015;Sugai & Horner, 2006).…”
Section: Systems Coaching and Rti Implementationmentioning
confidence: 97%