Plant Disease Management 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781351075725-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles and Practices of Plant Disease Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disease symptoms were scored as follows: 0, no symptoms; 1, a few small clubs on the lateral roots; 2, larger clubs on the lateral roots; 3, swelling of the main roots; 4, severe galling of tissues of both lateral and main roots. The DI was calculated according to the formula DI = [nw] × 100/4T, where n is the number of plants in each class, w is disease symptoms (0–4), and T is the total number of plants tested ( Chaube and Singh, 1991 ; Siemens et al, 2010 ). Data on the phenotype of disease index of the tested lines were analyzed for statistical significance using analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted using SPSS 17.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease symptoms were scored as follows: 0, no symptoms; 1, a few small clubs on the lateral roots; 2, larger clubs on the lateral roots; 3, swelling of the main roots; 4, severe galling of tissues of both lateral and main roots. The DI was calculated according to the formula DI = [nw] × 100/4T, where n is the number of plants in each class, w is disease symptoms (0–4), and T is the total number of plants tested ( Chaube and Singh, 1991 ; Siemens et al, 2010 ). Data on the phenotype of disease index of the tested lines were analyzed for statistical significance using analysis of variance (ANOVA) conducted using SPSS 17.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the roots were thoroughly washed, disease symptoms were scored as follows: 0, no symptoms; 1, a few small clubs on the lateral roots; 2, larger clubs on the lateral roots or small clubs on the main roots; and 3, large galls both on the lateral and main roots. Disease index (DI) was further calculated according to the formula DI = Σ[nw] × 100/3T, where n is the number of plants in each score class, w is the disease score (0 to 3), and T is the total number of plants tested ( Chaube and Singh, 1990 ). If the disease incidence and DI of “BJN3-1” was lower than 90% and 80, respectively, or the disease incidence of CR hosts was intermediate, the resistance tests were repeated until the susceptible controls were fully diseased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special application of quantitative ordinal scales when estimating plant disease severity is the calculation of a disease severity index (DSI). The DSI is a single index number for summarizing a large amount of information on disease severity (Chester 1950 ; Chaube and Singh 1991 ). The disease severity is estimated by a rater as a value on the scale and has been used to determine a DSI on a percentage basis.…”
Section: An Overview Of Quantitative Ordinal Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the midpoint of the interval being used, slightly different values may be selected based on the HB scale (Horsfall and Barratt 1945 ) by using the Elanco tables (Redman et al 1969 ; Campbell and Madden 1990 ), but this approach has not been widely adopted. The geometric mean of the percentage assessment could be another choice as it is less distorted by an extreme individual score (Chaube and Singh 1991 ; Hartung and Piepho 2007 ). But Chiang et al ( 2017a ) showed that using the geometric mean in place of the midpoint value for each class did not improve the accuracy of estimates.…”
Section: An Overview Of Quantitative Ordinal Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation